Mazak VS Siemens SINUMERIK 840D
As of 30 October 2026, Siemens SINUMERIK 840D is named by 142 companies and Mazak by 347; Mazak skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 44%), Siemens SINUMERIK 840D to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Mazak's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Siemens SINUMERIK 840D rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Mazak: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Siemens SINUMERIK 840D: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Mazak: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Siemens SINUMERIK 840D: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Mazak | share | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 26 | 7% | 18 | 13% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| 11-50 employees | 36 | 10% | 20 | 14% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| 51-200 employees | 91 | 26% | 24 | 17% | Mazak |
| 201-500 employees | 56 | 16% | 24 | 17% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 32 | 9% | 14 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 44 | 13% | 22 | 15% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| 5001-10000 employees | 22 | 6% | 5 | 4% | Mazak |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 11% | 14 | 10% | even |
| Segment | Mazak | share | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 262 | 76% | 106 | 75% | even |
| Automotive | 21 | 6% | 14 | 10% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| Commerce & trade | 15 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Business & finance services | 12 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Mazak |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 11 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Technology & software | 5 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 0% | 6 | 4% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Mazak | share | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 228 | 66% | 25 | 18% | Mazak |
| Germany | 46 | 13% | 92 | 65% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| France | 12 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finland | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Lithuania | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Mazak | share | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and production | 999 | 80% | 281 | 71% | Mazak |
| Skilled trades and field service | 94 | 8% | 51 | 13% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| Engineering (non-software) | 47 | 4% | 30 | 8% | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D |
| Unclassified | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Mazak →
Companies using Siemens SINUMERIK 840D →
plc programming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Siemens SINUMERIK 840D is named by 142 companies in job postings and Mazak by 347; 9 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/mazak-vs-sinumerik-840d)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Mazak vs Siemens SINUMERIK 840D: questions
Which is more used, Mazak or Siemens SINUMERIK 840D?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Mazak (347) over Siemens SINUMERIK 840D (142). By website-and-DNS footprint, Siemens SINUMERIK 840D (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Mazak?
44% of Mazak companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for Siemens SINUMERIK 840D. 30% of Mazak companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for Siemens SINUMERIK 840D.
Do companies run both?
9 companies name both in their postings, usually Mazak in marketing and Siemens SINUMERIK 840D in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Mazak or Siemens SINUMERIK 840D. Start free, no card.