Microsoft Access VS Oracle Database
As of 4 November 2026, Oracle Database is named by 10,129 companies and Microsoft Access by 1,422; Microsoft Access skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 35%), Oracle Database to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 51%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Access's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle Database rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Access: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- Oracle Database: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Microsoft Access: 1,000+ employees
- 51%
- Oracle Database: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Database | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 17 | 1% | 181 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 52 | 4% | 584 | 6% | Oracle Database |
| 11-50 employees | 125 | 9% | 1,168 | 12% | Oracle Database |
| 51-200 employees | 199 | 14% | 1,800 | 18% | Oracle Database |
| 201-500 employees | 167 | 12% | 1,451 | 14% | Oracle Database |
| 501-1000 employees | 136 | 10% | 1,069 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 272 | 19% | 1,971 | 19% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 114 | 8% | 645 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 340 | 24% | 1,260 | 12% | Microsoft Access |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Database | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 344 | 24% | 1,922 | 19% | Microsoft Access |
| Manufacturing & industry | 248 | 17% | 1,768 | 17% | even |
| Technology & software | 219 | 15% | 3,316 | 33% | Oracle Database |
| Health care | 117 | 8% | 316 | 3% | Microsoft Access |
| Public, community & associations | 101 | 7% | 315 | 3% | Microsoft Access |
| Consumer services & leisure | 82 | 6% | 365 | 4% | Microsoft Access |
| Commerce & trade | 71 | 5% | 507 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 60 | 4% | 432 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 47 | 3% | 299 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 47 | 3% | 276 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 37 | 3% | 213 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 35 | 2% | 247 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Database | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,034 | 73% | 5,941 | 59% | Microsoft Access |
| Canada | 67 | 5% | 303 | 3% | even |
| United Kingdom | 59 | 4% | 560 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 41 | 3% | 410 | 4% | even |
| France | 17 | 1% | 333 | 3% | Oracle Database |
| Australia | 14 | 1% | 153 | 2% | even |
| India | 11 | 1% | 291 | 3% | Oracle Database |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 6 | 0% | 88 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 5 | 0% | 140 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | – | – | 189 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 95 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 87 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Database | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 786 | 18% | 3,740 | 13% | Microsoft Access |
| Data & AI | 324 | 7% | 1,772 | 6% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 320 | 7% | 415 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| IT operations & business systems | 298 | 7% | 6,320 | 22% | Oracle Database |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 197 | 4% | 1,298 | 5% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 194 | 4% | 628 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| Software engineering | 173 | 4% | 7,609 | 27% | Oracle Database |
| Administration & office | 166 | 4% | 124 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 146 | 3% | 114 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Quality, safety & environment | 111 | 2% | 146 | 1% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 85 | 2% | 349 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 71 | 2% | 234 | 1% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 64 | 1% | 10 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 64 | 1% | 218 | 1% | even |
| Research and science | 60 | 1% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 49 | 1% | 60 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 48 | 1% | 75 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 45 | 1% | 92 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 44 | 1% | 359 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 43 | 1% | 40 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 42 | 1% | 313 | 1% | even |
| Real estate and property | 30 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 25 | 1% | 24 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 23 | 1% | 23 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 21 | 0% | 34 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 21 | 0% | 177 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality and food service | 20 | 0% | 33 | 0% | even |
| Social care and community | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 11 | 0% | 16 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 21 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 14 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Access →
Companies using Oracle Database →
relational databases ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle Database is named by 10,129 companies in job postings and Microsoft Access by 1,422; 116 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-access-vs-oracle-database)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Access vs Oracle Database: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Access or Oracle Database?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Oracle Database (10,129) over Microsoft Access (1,422). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle Database (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Access?
26% of Microsoft Access companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Oracle Database. 51% of Microsoft Access companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Oracle Database.
Do companies run both?
116 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Access in marketing and Oracle Database in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Access or Oracle Database. Start free, no card.