Microsoft Access VS Oracle Exadata
As of 30 October 2026, Oracle Exadata is named by 122 companies and Microsoft Access by 987; Microsoft Access skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 36%), Oracle Exadata to companies over 1,000 (39% vs 53%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Access's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle Exadata rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Access: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- Oracle Exadata: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Microsoft Access: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Oracle Exadata: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 3.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Exadata | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 92 | 9% | 16 | 13% | Oracle Exadata |
| 51-200 employees | 133 | 13% | 23 | 19% | Oracle Exadata |
| 201-500 employees | 118 | 12% | 12 | 10% | Microsoft Access |
| 501-1000 employees | 90 | 9% | 16 | 13% | Oracle Exadata |
| 1001-5000 employees | 194 | 20% | 20 | 16% | Microsoft Access |
| 5001-10000 employees | 84 | 9% | 8 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 241 | 24% | 20 | 16% | Microsoft Access |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Exadata | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 249 | 25% | 28 | 23% | Microsoft Access |
| Manufacturing & industry | 187 | 19% | 6 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Technology & software | 165 | 17% | 64 | 52% | Oracle Exadata |
| Health care | 85 | 9% | 5 | 4% | Microsoft Access |
| Public, community & associations | 51 | 5% | 2 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 50 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 48 | 5% | 1 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 33 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 31 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 28 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 28 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 23 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Exadata | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 753 | 76% | 68 | 56% | Microsoft Access |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 44 | 4% | 2 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| Germany | 32 | 3% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Oracle Exadata |
| France | 12 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Oracle Exadata |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 6 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Oracle Exadata |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Oracle Exadata |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | Oracle Exadata | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 700 | 18% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 290 | 8% | 4 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Data & AI | 281 | 7% | 86 | 13% | Oracle Exadata |
| IT operations & business systems | 262 | 7% | 346 | 53% | Oracle Exadata |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 175 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 167 | 4% | 8 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Administration & office | 146 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 139 | 4% | 59 | 9% | Oracle Exadata |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 129 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Quality, safety & environment | 106 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | 66 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 65 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 30 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Access →
Companies using Oracle Exadata →
relational databases ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle Exadata is named by 122 companies in job postings and Microsoft Access by 987; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-access-vs-oracle-exadata)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Access vs Oracle Exadata: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Access or Oracle Exadata?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Access (987) over Oracle Exadata (122). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle Exadata (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Access?
26% of Microsoft Access companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for Oracle Exadata. 53% of Microsoft Access companies have over 1,000 employees, against 39% for Oracle Exadata.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Access in marketing and Oracle Exadata in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Access or Oracle Exadata. Start free, no card.