Microsoft Access VS SAP HANA
As of 30 October 2026, SAP HANA is named by 730 companies and Microsoft Access by 987; Microsoft Access skews to companies under 200 people (26% vs 29%), SAP HANA to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 53%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Access's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP HANA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Access: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- SAP HANA: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Microsoft Access: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- SAP HANA: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 4.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SAP HANA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 3% | 33 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 92 | 9% | 72 | 10% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 133 | 13% | 104 | 14% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 118 | 12% | 69 | 9% | Microsoft Access |
| 501-1000 employees | 90 | 9% | 63 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 194 | 20% | 138 | 19% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 84 | 9% | 53 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 241 | 24% | 197 | 27% | SAP HANA |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SAP HANA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 249 | 25% | 79 | 11% | Microsoft Access |
| Manufacturing & industry | 187 | 19% | 211 | 29% | SAP HANA |
| Technology & software | 165 | 17% | 224 | 31% | SAP HANA |
| Health care | 85 | 9% | 16 | 2% | Microsoft Access |
| Public, community & associations | 51 | 5% | 7 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 50 | 5% | 52 | 7% | SAP HANA |
| Commerce & trade | 48 | 5% | 41 | 6% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 33 | 3% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 31 | 3% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 28 | 3% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 28 | 3% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 23 | 2% | 27 | 4% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SAP HANA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 753 | 76% | 314 | 43% | Microsoft Access |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 5% | 41 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 44 | 4% | 10 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Germany | 32 | 3% | 142 | 19% | SAP HANA |
| Australia | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 12 | 1% | 32 | 4% | SAP HANA |
| Singapore | 8 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 6 | 1% | 20 | 3% | SAP HANA |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 6 | 1% | 27 | 4% | SAP HANA |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Spain | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Access | share | SAP HANA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 700 | 18% | 220 | 5% | Microsoft Access |
| Engineering (non-software) | 290 | 8% | 21 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Data & AI | 281 | 7% | 383 | 8% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 262 | 7% | 2,710 | 60% | SAP HANA |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 175 | 5% | 47 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Product, program & project management | 167 | 4% | 62 | 1% | Microsoft Access |
| Administration & office | 146 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 139 | 4% | 379 | 8% | SAP HANA |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 129 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 106 | 3% | 15 | 0% | Microsoft Access |
| Procurement and purchasing | 66 | 2% | 26 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 65 | 2% | 25 | 1% | even |
| Sales | – | – | 41 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 23 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Access →
Companies using SAP HANA →
relational databases ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP HANA is named by 730 companies in job postings and Microsoft Access by 987; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-access-vs-sap-hana)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Access vs SAP HANA: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Access or SAP HANA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Access (987) over SAP HANA (730). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP HANA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Access?
26% of Microsoft Access companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for SAP HANA. 53% of Microsoft Access companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for SAP HANA.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Access in marketing and SAP HANA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Access or SAP HANA. Start free, no card.