Microsoft Configuration Manager VS Red Hat Satellite
As of 30 October 2026, Red Hat Satellite is named by 155 companies and Microsoft Configuration Manager by 930; Microsoft Configuration Manager skews to companies under 200 people (22% vs 35%), Red Hat Satellite to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 54%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Configuration Manager's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Red Hat Satellite rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Configuration Manager: 2–200 employees
- 22%
- Red Hat Satellite: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Microsoft Configuration Manager: 1,000+ employees
- 54%
- Red Hat Satellite: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.1 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Red Hat Satellite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 7 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 21 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 66 | 7% | 21 | 14% | Red Hat Satellite |
| 51-200 employees | 117 | 13% | 28 | 18% | Red Hat Satellite |
| 201-500 employees | 108 | 12% | 23 | 15% | Red Hat Satellite |
| 501-1000 employees | 106 | 11% | 13 | 8% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| 1001-5000 employees | 237 | 25% | 27 | 17% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| 5001-10000 employees | 73 | 8% | 13 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 195 | 21% | 22 | 14% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Segment | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Red Hat Satellite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 297 | 32% | 73 | 47% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Business & finance services | 199 | 21% | 29 | 19% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Manufacturing & industry | 158 | 17% | 26 | 17% | even |
| Health care | 39 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Consumer services & leisure | 37 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Property & construction | 37 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 37 | 4% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 32 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 31 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Automotive | 21 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 14 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Red Hat Satellite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 582 | 63% | 97 | 63% | even |
| United Kingdom | 70 | 8% | 8 | 5% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Germany | 43 | 5% | 13 | 8% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Canada | 28 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| France | 28 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 17 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 12 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 12 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| BD | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Configuration Manager | share | Red Hat Satellite | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 2,846 | 65% | 440 | 61% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Engineering (non-software) | 188 | 4% | 72 | 10% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Software engineering | 116 | 3% | 62 | 9% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Customer service & success | 108 | 2% | 2 | 0% | Microsoft Configuration Manager |
| Product, program & project management | 66 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 48 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 48 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 30 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Configuration Manager →
Companies using Red Hat Satellite →
endpoint management uem ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Red Hat Satellite is named by 155 companies in job postings and Microsoft Configuration Manager by 930; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-configuration-manager-vs-red-hat-satellite)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Satellite: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Configuration Manager or Red Hat Satellite?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Configuration Manager (930) over Red Hat Satellite (155). By website-and-DNS footprint, Red Hat Satellite (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Configuration Manager?
22% of Microsoft Configuration Manager companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Red Hat Satellite. 54% of Microsoft Configuration Manager companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Red Hat Satellite.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Configuration Manager in marketing and Red Hat Satellite in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Configuration Manager or Red Hat Satellite. Start free, no card.