Microsoft Defender VS Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
As of 5 November 2026, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is named by 521 companies and Microsoft Defender by 1,346; Microsoft Defender skews to companies under 200 people (33% vs 32%), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 36%).
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Defender's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Defender: 2–200 employees
- 33%
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Microsoft Defender: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Defender | share | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 18 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 57 | 4% | 27 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 124 | 9% | 44 | 8% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 257 | 19% | 96 | 18% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 234 | 17% | 92 | 18% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 178 | 13% | 52 | 10% | Microsoft Defender |
| 1001-5000 employees | 257 | 19% | 114 | 22% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| 5001-10000 employees | 70 | 5% | 29 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 151 | 11% | 63 | 12% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Defender | share | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 471 | 35% | 166 | 32% | Microsoft Defender |
| Business & finance services | 305 | 23% | 96 | 18% | Microsoft Defender |
| Manufacturing & industry | 189 | 14% | 93 | 18% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Public, community & associations | 54 | 4% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 51 | 4% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 50 | 4% | 47 | 9% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Property & construction | 45 | 3% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 41 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 40 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 35 | 3% | 25 | 5% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Media & content | 29 | 2% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 19 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Defender | share | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 720 | 53% | 247 | 47% | Microsoft Defender |
| United Kingdom | 115 | 9% | 36 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 88 | 7% | 107 | 21% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Canada | 55 | 4% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 42 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 37 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| France | 36 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Denmark | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 18 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| India | 17 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 15 | 1% | 16 | 3% | even |
| Austria | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Defender | share | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 2,642 | 77% | 978 | 66% | Microsoft Defender |
| Software engineering | 99 | 3% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 80 | 2% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 50 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 45 | 1% | 24 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 35 | 1% | 6 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 25 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 23 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 20 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 17 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 5 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 3 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 221 | 15% | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 21 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Defender →
Companies using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint →
endpoint protection edr ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is named by 521 companies in job postings and Microsoft Defender by 1,346; 212 name both. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-defender-vs-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Defender vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Defender or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Defender (1,346) over Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (521). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Defender?
33% of Microsoft Defender companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. 36% of Microsoft Defender companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
Do companies run both?
212 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Defender in marketing and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Defender or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Start free, no card.