Microsoft DFS VS NetApp
As of 30 October 2026, NetApp is named by 414 companies and Microsoft DFS by 136; Microsoft DFS skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 36%), NetApp to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft DFS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, NetApp rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft DFS: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- NetApp: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Microsoft DFS: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- NetApp: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 4.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft DFS | share | NetApp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 4% | 17 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 25 | 18% | 58 | 14% | Microsoft DFS |
| 51-200 employees | 22 | 16% | 74 | 18% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 19 | 14% | 47 | 11% | Microsoft DFS |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 11% | 32 | 8% | Microsoft DFS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 22 | 16% | 79 | 19% | NetApp |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 9% | 27 | 7% | Microsoft DFS |
| 10,001+ employees | 15 | 11% | 78 | 19% | NetApp |
| Segment | Microsoft DFS | share | NetApp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 55 | 40% | 204 | 49% | NetApp |
| Business & finance services | 27 | 20% | 65 | 16% | Microsoft DFS |
| Manufacturing & industry | 21 | 15% | 51 | 12% | Microsoft DFS |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 5% | 19 | 5% | even |
| Property & construction | 6 | 4% | 4 | 1% | Microsoft DFS |
| Automotive | 3 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 2% | 17 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft DFS | share | NetApp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 64% | 259 | 63% | even |
| Germany | 10 | 7% | 35 | 8% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 4% | 8 | 2% | even |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% | 18 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| India | 3 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Estonia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 20 | 5% | NetApp |
| Austria | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft DFS | share | NetApp | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 293 | 59% | 1,108 | 44% | Microsoft DFS |
| Software engineering | 52 | 10% | 233 | 9% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 40 | 8% | 122 | 5% | Microsoft DFS |
| Product, program & project management | 18 | 4% | 63 | 3% | even |
| Customer service & success | 13 | 3% | 64 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 8 | 2% | 349 | 14% | NetApp |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 1% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 3 | 1% | 35 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 36 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 29 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft DFS →
Companies using NetApp →
storage systems ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
NetApp is named by 414 companies in job postings and Microsoft DFS by 136; 24 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-dfs-vs-netapp)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft DFS vs NetApp: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft DFS or NetApp?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, NetApp (414) over Microsoft DFS (136). By website-and-DNS footprint, NetApp (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft DFS?
38% of Microsoft DFS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for NetApp. 36% of Microsoft DFS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for NetApp.
Do companies run both?
24 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft DFS in marketing and NetApp in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft DFS or NetApp. Start free, no card.