Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · storage systems

Microsoft DFS VS Pure Storage

As of 30 October 2026, Pure Storage is named by 170 companies and Microsoft DFS by 136; Microsoft DFS skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 27%), Pure Storage to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 36%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft DFS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Pure Storage rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Microsoft DFS: 2–200 employees
38%
Pure Storage: 2–200 employees
27%
Microsoft DFS: 1,000+ employees
36%
Pure Storage: 1,000+ employees
47%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.4 · 3.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
136companies name Microsoft DFS
170companies name Pure Storage
0name both
333 · 528postings in 90 days, Microsoft DFS · Pure Storage
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentMicrosoft DFSsharePure StorageshareLeans
Self-employed11%––outside top 12
2-10 employees54%53%even
11-50 employees2518%159%Microsoft DFS
51-200 employees2216%2615%even
201-500 employees1914%2515%even
501-1000 employees1511%1911%even
1001-5000 employees2216%4325%Pure Storage
5001-10000 employees129%169%even
10,001+ employees1511%2112%even
By industry
SegmentMicrosoft DFSsharePure StorageshareLeans
Technology & software5540%7444%Pure Storage
Business & finance services2720%3521%even
Manufacturing & industry2115%2816%even
Public, community & associations75%53%Microsoft DFS
Property & construction64%32%Microsoft DFS
Automotive32%21%even
Commerce & trade32%42%even
Health care32%64%even
Media & content32%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental32%32%even
Utilities & infrastructure32%42%even
Consumer services & leisure21%32%even
Agriculture & forestry––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentMicrosoft DFSsharePure StorageshareLeans
United States8764%11970%Pure Storage
Germany107%95%Microsoft DFS
Canada54%53%even
United Kingdom43%85%even
Netherlands43%––outside top 12
Switzerland32%––outside top 12
India32%21%even
Australia21%21%even
Belgium21%––outside top 12
Brazil21%––outside top 12
Estonia21%––outside top 12
France21%42%even
United Arab Emirates––32%outside top 12
Italy––32%outside top 12
Austria––21%outside top 12
Poland––21%outside top 12
Singapore––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentMicrosoft DFSsharePure StorageshareLeans
IT operations & business systems29359%32749%Microsoft DFS
Software engineering5210%426%Microsoft DFS
Engineering (non-software)408%538%even
Product, program & project management184%112%even
Customer service & success133%101%even
Sales82%7411%Pure Storage
General management & consulting41%41%even
Data & AI31%71%even
Finance & accounting31%41%even
Skilled trades and field service31%––outside top 12
Administration & office20%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport20%41%even
Unclassified––91%outside top 12
Research and science––41%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Pure Storage is named by 170 companies in job postings and Microsoft DFS by 136; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-dfs-vs-pure-storage)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Microsoft DFS vs Pure Storage: questions

Which is more used, Microsoft DFS or Pure Storage?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Pure Storage (170) over Microsoft DFS (136). By website-and-DNS footprint, Pure Storage (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Microsoft DFS?

38% of Microsoft DFS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Pure Storage. 36% of Microsoft DFS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for Pure Storage.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft DFS in marketing and Pure Storage in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Microsoft DFS or Pure Storage. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market