Microsoft Dynamics GP VS Sage 50
As of 30 October 2026, Sage 50 is named by 105 companies and Microsoft Dynamics GP by 399; Microsoft Dynamics GP skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 69%), Sage 50 to companies over 1,000 (14% vs 39%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Dynamics GP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sage 50 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Dynamics GP: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- Sage 50: 2–200 employees
- 69%
- Microsoft Dynamics GP: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- Sage 50: 1,000+ employees
- 14%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.7 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Dynamics GP | share | Sage 50 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 2% | 13 | 12% | Sage 50 |
| 11-50 employees | 25 | 6% | 25 | 24% | Sage 50 |
| 51-200 employees | 77 | 19% | 34 | 32% | Sage 50 |
| 201-500 employees | 83 | 21% | 10 | 10% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| 501-1000 employees | 51 | 13% | 8 | 8% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| 1001-5000 employees | 94 | 24% | 10 | 10% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| 5001-10000 employees | 29 | 7% | 3 | 3% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| 10,001+ employees | 31 | 8% | 2 | 2% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Segment | Microsoft Dynamics GP | share | Sage 50 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 59 | 15% | 13 | 12% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Business & finance services | 58 | 15% | 34 | 32% | Sage 50 |
| Technology & software | 48 | 12% | 5 | 5% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Health care | 46 | 12% | 6 | 6% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Public, community & associations | 42 | 11% | 14 | 13% | Sage 50 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 27 | 7% | 3 | 3% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Property & construction | 25 | 6% | 12 | 11% | Sage 50 |
| Commerce & trade | 23 | 6% | 3 | 3% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Consumer services & leisure | 17 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 14 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 10 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | – | – | 5 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Dynamics GP | share | Sage 50 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 323 | 81% | 40 | 38% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Canada | 38 | 10% | 20 | 19% | Sage 50 |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% | 28 | 27% | Sage 50 |
| France | 6 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 1 | 0% | 3 | 3% | Sage 50 |
| Ireland | 1 | 0% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| ET | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| KH | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| PK | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| TT | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Dynamics GP | share | Sage 50 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 562 | 57% | 228 | 64% | Sage 50 |
| IT operations & business systems | 84 | 9% | 15 | 4% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Software engineering | 52 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 44 | 4% | 5 | 1% | Microsoft Dynamics GP |
| Customer service & success | 25 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 24 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 19 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | 16 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 14 | 1% | 21 | 6% | Sage 50 |
| Data & AI | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 10 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Dynamics GP →
Companies using Sage 50 →
accounting software ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sage 50 is named by 105 companies in job postings and Microsoft Dynamics GP by 399; 5 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-dynamics-gp-vs-sage-50)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Dynamics GP vs Sage 50: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Dynamics GP or Sage 50?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Dynamics GP (399) over Sage 50 (105). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sage 50 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Dynamics GP?
28% of Microsoft Dynamics GP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 69% for Sage 50. 39% of Microsoft Dynamics GP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 14% for Sage 50.
Do companies run both?
5 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Dynamics GP in marketing and Sage 50 in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Dynamics GP or Sage 50. Start free, no card.