Microsoft Hyper-V VS Proxmox VE
As of 5 November 2026, Proxmox VE is named by 751 companies and Microsoft Hyper-V by 2,214; Microsoft Hyper-V skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 53%), Proxmox VE to companies over 1,000 (21% vs 29%).
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Hyper-V's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Proxmox VE rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Proxmox VE: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Proxmox VE: 1,000+ employees
- 21%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.1 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 47 | 2% | 18 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 175 | 8% | 73 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 319 | 14% | 140 | 19% | Proxmox VE |
| 51-200 employees | 479 | 22% | 186 | 25% | Proxmox VE |
| 201-500 employees | 347 | 16% | 116 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 195 | 9% | 59 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 335 | 15% | 90 | 12% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| 5001-10000 employees | 88 | 4% | 13 | 2% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| 10,001+ employees | 229 | 10% | 56 | 7% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 912 | 41% | 329 | 44% | Proxmox VE |
| Manufacturing & industry | 342 | 15% | 125 | 17% | even |
| Business & finance services | 307 | 14% | 89 | 12% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Commerce & trade | 100 | 5% | 25 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 88 | 4% | 46 | 6% | Proxmox VE |
| Consumer services & leisure | 84 | 4% | 31 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 75 | 3% | 36 | 5% | even |
| Health care | 68 | 3% | 7 | 1% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Property & construction | 60 | 3% | 15 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 57 | 3% | 28 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 53 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 51 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,036 | 47% | 246 | 33% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Germany | 292 | 13% | 170 | 23% | Proxmox VE |
| United Kingdom | 145 | 7% | 32 | 4% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| France | 100 | 5% | 71 | 9% | Proxmox VE |
| Canada | 61 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 40 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| India | 38 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 35 | 2% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 34 | 2% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 30 | 1% | 20 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 29 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 24 | 1% | 20 | 3% | even |
| Spain | – | – | 17 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 12 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 6,092 | 72% | 1,025 | 62% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Software engineering | 502 | 6% | 296 | 18% | Proxmox VE |
| Engineering (non-software) | 449 | 5% | 72 | 4% | even |
| Customer service & success | 184 | 2% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 129 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 69 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 64 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 31 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 23 | 0% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 13 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 11 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 7 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 4 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 3 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 3 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Hyper-V →
Companies using Proxmox VE →
virtualization vdi ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Proxmox VE is named by 751 companies in job postings and Microsoft Hyper-V by 2,214; 307 name both. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-hyper-v-vs-proxmox-ve)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Hyper-V vs Proxmox VE: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Hyper-V or Proxmox VE?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Hyper-V (2,214) over Proxmox VE (751). By website-and-DNS footprint, Proxmox VE (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Hyper-V?
44% of Microsoft Hyper-V companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 53% for Proxmox VE. 29% of Microsoft Hyper-V companies have over 1,000 employees, against 21% for Proxmox VE.
Do companies run both?
307 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Hyper-V in marketing and Proxmox VE in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Hyper-V or Proxmox VE. Start free, no card.