Microsoft Hyper-V VS QEMU
As of 30 October 2026, QEMU is named by 161 companies and Microsoft Hyper-V by 1,646; Microsoft Hyper-V skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 51%), QEMU to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Hyper-V's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, QEMU rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- QEMU: 2–200 employees
- 51%
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- QEMU: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 3.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | QEMU | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 15 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 94 | 6% | 18 | 11% | QEMU |
| 11-50 employees | 274 | 17% | 29 | 18% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 366 | 22% | 35 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 262 | 16% | 20 | 12% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| 501-1000 employees | 146 | 9% | 10 | 6% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| 1001-5000 employees | 251 | 15% | 26 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 63 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 175 | 11% | 19 | 12% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | QEMU | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 713 | 43% | 101 | 63% | QEMU |
| Manufacturing & industry | 275 | 17% | 32 | 20% | QEMU |
| Business & finance services | 196 | 12% | 7 | 4% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Commerce & trade | 70 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 68 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 54 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 53 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 48 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 41 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 38 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 38 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 38 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | QEMU | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 802 | 49% | 109 | 68% | QEMU |
| Germany | 236 | 14% | 15 | 9% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| United Kingdom | 112 | 7% | 8 | 5% | even |
| France | 72 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 52 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 32 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 29 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 29 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 24 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 24 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 19 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 19 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Cyprus | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | QEMU | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 3,535 | 64% | 126 | 17% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Software engineering | 398 | 7% | 403 | 54% | QEMU |
| Engineering (non-software) | 384 | 7% | 61 | 8% | even |
| Customer service & success | 150 | 3% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 124 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 64 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 58 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 28 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 18 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Hyper-V →
Companies using QEMU →
virtualization vdi ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
QEMU is named by 161 companies in job postings and Microsoft Hyper-V by 1,646; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-hyper-v-vs-qemu)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Hyper-V vs QEMU: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Hyper-V or QEMU?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Hyper-V (1,646) over QEMU (161). By website-and-DNS footprint, QEMU (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Hyper-V?
45% of Microsoft Hyper-V companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 51% for QEMU. 30% of Microsoft Hyper-V companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for QEMU.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Hyper-V in marketing and QEMU in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Hyper-V or QEMU. Start free, no card.