Microsoft Power Pivot VS Sigma Computing
As of 30 October 2026, Sigma Computing is named by 439 companies and Microsoft Power Pivot by 319; Microsoft Power Pivot skews to companies under 200 people (18% vs 42%), Sigma Computing to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 55%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Microsoft Power Pivot's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sigma Computing rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Microsoft Power Pivot: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- Sigma Computing: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Microsoft Power Pivot: 1,000+ employees
- 55%
- Sigma Computing: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Microsoft Power Pivot | share | Sigma Computing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 3% | 26 | 6% | Sigma Computing |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 5% | 53 | 12% | Sigma Computing |
| 51-200 employees | 29 | 9% | 105 | 24% | Sigma Computing |
| 201-500 employees | 45 | 14% | 79 | 18% | Sigma Computing |
| 501-1000 employees | 38 | 12% | 52 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 70 | 22% | 62 | 14% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| 5001-10000 employees | 30 | 9% | 22 | 5% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| 10,001+ employees | 77 | 24% | 36 | 8% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| Segment | Microsoft Power Pivot | share | Sigma Computing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 79 | 25% | 45 | 10% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| Business & finance services | 77 | 24% | 103 | 23% | even |
| Technology & software | 51 | 16% | 177 | 40% | Sigma Computing |
| Commerce & trade | 23 | 7% | 18 | 4% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 18 | 6% | 10 | 2% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| Automotive | 12 | 4% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 12 | 4% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 2% | 28 | 6% | Sigma Computing |
| Agriculture & forestry | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 12 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Power Pivot | share | Sigma Computing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 170 | 53% | 322 | 73% | Sigma Computing |
| Germany | 26 | 8% | 28 | 6% | even |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 6% | 27 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 12 | 4% | 10 | 2% | even |
| France | 12 | 4% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 9 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| India | 4 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Microsoft Power Pivot | share | Sigma Computing | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 261 | 32% | 138 | 9% | Microsoft Power Pivot |
| Data & AI | 168 | 21% | 396 | 26% | Sigma Computing |
| IT operations & business systems | 73 | 9% | 158 | 10% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 28 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 20 | 2% | 72 | 5% | Sigma Computing |
| Business development & strategy | 19 | 2% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 15 | 2% | 53 | 4% | even |
| Human resources | 13 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 12 | 1% | 38 | 3% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 7 | 1% | 72 | 5% | Sigma Computing |
| General management & consulting | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 84 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 64 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 36 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 27 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Microsoft Power Pivot →
Companies using Sigma Computing →
BI & reporting ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sigma Computing is named by 439 companies in job postings and Microsoft Power Pivot by 319; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/microsoft-power-pivot-vs-sigma-computing)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Microsoft Power Pivot vs Sigma Computing: questions
Which is more used, Microsoft Power Pivot or Sigma Computing?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Sigma Computing (439) over Microsoft Power Pivot (319). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sigma Computing (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Microsoft Power Pivot?
18% of Microsoft Power Pivot companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for Sigma Computing. 55% of Microsoft Power Pivot companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Sigma Computing.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Microsoft Power Pivot in marketing and Sigma Computing in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Microsoft Power Pivot or Sigma Computing. Start free, no card.