MobX VS Redux Toolkit
As of 30 October 2026, Redux Toolkit is named by 156 companies and MobX by 154; MobX skews to companies under 200 people (69% vs 55%), Redux Toolkit to companies over 1,000 (20% vs 14%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: MobX's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Redux Toolkit rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- MobX: 2–200 employees
- 69%
- Redux Toolkit: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- MobX: 1,000+ employees
- 14%
- Redux Toolkit: 1,000+ employees
- 20%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.2 · 3.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | MobX | share | Redux Toolkit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 20 | 13% | 18 | 12% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 53 | 34% | 31 | 20% | MobX |
| 51-200 employees | 33 | 21% | 37 | 24% | Redux Toolkit |
| 201-500 employees | 15 | 10% | 22 | 14% | Redux Toolkit |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 6% | 15 | 10% | Redux Toolkit |
| 1001-5000 employees | 11 | 7% | 14 | 9% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 3% | 11 | 7% | Redux Toolkit |
| Segment | MobX | share | Redux Toolkit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 113 | 73% | 93 | 60% | MobX |
| Business & finance services | 20 | 13% | 31 | 20% | Redux Toolkit |
| Manufacturing & industry | 7 | 5% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Redux Toolkit |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MobX | share | Redux Toolkit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 84 | 55% | 90 | 58% | Redux Toolkit |
| India | 13 | 8% | 16 | 10% | even |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 8% | 7 | 4% | MobX |
| Germany | 7 | 5% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 7 | 5% | 2 | 1% | MobX |
| Canada | 4 | 3% | 8 | 5% | Redux Toolkit |
| France | 3 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| VN | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MobX | share | Redux Toolkit | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 285 | 85% | 574 | 94% | Redux Toolkit |
| Data & AI | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using MobX →
Companies using Redux Toolkit →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Redux Toolkit is named by 156 companies in job postings and MobX by 154; 15 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/mobx-vs-redux-toolkit)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
MobX vs Redux Toolkit: questions
Which is more used, MobX or Redux Toolkit?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Redux Toolkit (156) over MobX (154). By website-and-DNS footprint, Redux Toolkit (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses MobX?
69% of MobX companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for Redux Toolkit. 14% of MobX companies have over 1,000 employees, against 20% for Redux Toolkit.
Do companies run both?
15 companies name both in their postings, usually MobX in marketing and Redux Toolkit in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on MobX or Redux Toolkit. Start free, no card.