ModelSim VS Synopsys EDA tools
As of 30 October 2026, Synopsys EDA tools is named by 187 companies and ModelSim by 118; ModelSim skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 53%), Synopsys EDA tools to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: ModelSim's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Synopsys EDA tools rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- ModelSim: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Synopsys EDA tools: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- ModelSim: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Synopsys EDA tools: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.6 · 6.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | ModelSim | share | Synopsys EDA tools | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 7% | 22 | 12% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| 11-50 employees | 18 | 15% | 39 | 21% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| 51-200 employees | 24 | 20% | 38 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 15 | 13% | 29 | 16% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 8% | 8 | 4% | ModelSim |
| 1001-5000 employees | 16 | 14% | 14 | 7% | ModelSim |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 5% | 13 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 21 | 18% | 23 | 12% | ModelSim |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ModelSim | share | Synopsys EDA tools | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 60 | 51% | 98 | 52% | even |
| Technology & software | 23 | 19% | 43 | 23% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| Business & finance services | 19 | 16% | 16 | 9% | ModelSim |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 8% | 5 | 3% | ModelSim |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 2% | 7 | 4% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 7 | 4% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ModelSim | share | Synopsys EDA tools | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 58% | 117 | 63% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% | 12 | 6% | ModelSim |
| Germany | 8 | 7% | 10 | 5% | even |
| France | 6 | 5% | 4 | 2% | ModelSim |
| India | 5 | 4% | 12 | 6% | Synopsys EDA tools |
| China | 3 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Canada | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | ModelSim | share | Synopsys EDA tools | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 409 | 78% | 1,238 | 75% | ModelSim |
| Software engineering | 59 | 11% | 58 | 4% | ModelSim |
| Sales | 9 | 2% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 46 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 17 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using ModelSim →
Companies using Synopsys EDA tools →
semiconductor eda ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Synopsys EDA tools is named by 187 companies in job postings and ModelSim by 118; 12 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/modelsim-vs-synopsys)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
ModelSim vs Synopsys EDA tools: questions
Which is more used, ModelSim or Synopsys EDA tools?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Synopsys EDA tools (187) over ModelSim (118). By website-and-DNS footprint, Synopsys EDA tools (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses ModelSim?
42% of ModelSim companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 53% for Synopsys EDA tools. 36% of ModelSim companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Synopsys EDA tools.
Do companies run both?
12 companies name both in their postings, usually ModelSim in marketing and Synopsys EDA tools in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on ModelSim or Synopsys EDA tools. Start free, no card.