MS-DOS VS Windows Server
As of 4 November 2026, Windows Server is named by 5,784 companies and MS-DOS by 161; MS-DOS skews to companies under 200 people (29% vs 40%), Windows Server to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 45%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: MS-DOS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Windows Server rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- MS-DOS: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Windows Server: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- MS-DOS: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Windows Server: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.2 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | MS-DOS | share | Windows Server | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 85 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 9 | 6% | 352 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 9% | 760 | 13% | Windows Server |
| 51-200 employees | 24 | 15% | 1,181 | 20% | Windows Server |
| 201-500 employees | 19 | 12% | 969 | 17% | Windows Server |
| 501-1000 employees | 21 | 13% | 612 | 11% | MS-DOS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 29 | 18% | 946 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 9% | 283 | 5% | MS-DOS |
| 10,001+ employees | 29 | 18% | 596 | 10% | MS-DOS |
| Segment | MS-DOS | share | Windows Server | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 41 | 25% | 843 | 15% | MS-DOS |
| Technology & software | 31 | 19% | 2,066 | 36% | Windows Server |
| Business & finance services | 23 | 14% | 1,043 | 18% | Windows Server |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 7% | 230 | 4% | MS-DOS |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 6% | 241 | 4% | MS-DOS |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 5% | 257 | 4% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 8 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 7 | 4% | 174 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 4% | 257 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 5 | 3% | 105 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 3% | 130 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 224 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | – | – | 138 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MS-DOS | share | Windows Server | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 109 | 68% | 2,869 | 50% | MS-DOS |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% | 323 | 6% | even |
| France | 7 | 4% | 228 | 4% | even |
| Brazil | 5 | 3% | 96 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 170 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 686 | 12% | Windows Server |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 84 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | 74 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | 72 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 107 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 77 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 75 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MS-DOS | share | Windows Server | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skilled trades and field service | 93 | 18% | 156 | 1% | MS-DOS |
| IT operations & business systems | 55 | 11% | 13,010 | 64% | Windows Server |
| Software engineering | 39 | 8% | 1,842 | 9% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 35 | 7% | 1,089 | 5% | even |
| Sales | 22 | 4% | 155 | 1% | MS-DOS |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 17 | 3% | 15 | 0% | MS-DOS |
| Product, program & project management | 17 | 3% | 252 | 1% | MS-DOS |
| Customer service & success | 16 | 3% | 599 | 3% | even |
| Administration & office | 15 | 3% | 33 | 0% | MS-DOS |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 15 | 3% | 15 | 0% | MS-DOS |
| Hospitality and food service | 13 | 3% | 9 | 0% | MS-DOS |
| Finance & accounting | 11 | 2% | 19 | 0% | MS-DOS |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 8 | 2% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 1% | 21 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 7 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 6 | 1% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 5 | 1% | 69 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 5 | 1% | 18 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 5 | 1% | 42 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 32 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | 14 | 0% | even |
| Social care and community | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 231 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Real estate and property | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using MS-DOS →
Companies using Windows Server →
windows os ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Windows Server is named by 5,784 companies in job postings and MS-DOS by 161; 10 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ms-dos-vs-windows-server)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
MS-DOS vs Windows Server: questions
Which is more used, MS-DOS or Windows Server?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Windows Server (5,784) over MS-DOS (161). By website-and-DNS footprint, Windows Server (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses MS-DOS?
29% of MS-DOS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for Windows Server. 45% of MS-DOS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for Windows Server.
Do companies run both?
10 companies name both in their postings, usually MS-DOS in marketing and Windows Server in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on MS-DOS or Windows Server. Start free, no card.