MuleSoft VS SAP PI/PO
As of 30 October 2026, SAP PI/PO is named by 186 companies and MuleSoft by 972; MuleSoft skews to companies under 200 people (30% vs 26%), SAP PI/PO to companies over 1,000 (56% vs 44%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: MuleSoft's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP PI/PO rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- MuleSoft: 2–200 employees
- 30%
- SAP PI/PO: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- MuleSoft: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- SAP PI/PO: 1,000+ employees
- 56%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 3.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 270 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | MuleSoft | share | SAP PI/PO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 43 | 4% | 11 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 90 | 9% | 19 | 10% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 163 | 17% | 18 | 10% | MuleSoft |
| 201-500 employees | 156 | 16% | 18 | 10% | MuleSoft |
| 501-1000 employees | 86 | 9% | 12 | 6% | MuleSoft |
| 1001-5000 employees | 193 | 20% | 27 | 15% | MuleSoft |
| 5001-10000 employees | 84 | 9% | 13 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 149 | 15% | 64 | 34% | SAP PI/PO |
| Segment | MuleSoft | share | SAP PI/PO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 423 | 44% | 65 | 35% | MuleSoft |
| Business & finance services | 196 | 20% | 22 | 12% | MuleSoft |
| Manufacturing & industry | 135 | 14% | 51 | 27% | SAP PI/PO |
| Commerce & trade | 41 | 4% | 13 | 7% | SAP PI/PO |
| Health care | 29 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 29 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 21 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 20 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 19 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 18 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 15 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 13 | 1% | 9 | 5% | SAP PI/PO |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MuleSoft | share | SAP PI/PO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 681 | 70% | 97 | 52% | MuleSoft |
| United Kingdom | 59 | 6% | 10 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 33 | 3% | 22 | 12% | SAP PI/PO |
| Canada | 29 | 3% | 7 | 4% | even |
| India | 25 | 3% | 9 | 5% | SAP PI/PO |
| France | 20 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 17 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 13 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MuleSoft | share | SAP PI/PO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 2,063 | 48% | 195 | 25% | MuleSoft |
| IT operations & business systems | 893 | 21% | 436 | 56% | SAP PI/PO |
| Data & AI | 206 | 5% | 5 | 1% | MuleSoft |
| Product, program & project management | 166 | 4% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 143 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 32 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 28 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 13 | 0% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 10 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 8 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 7 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using MuleSoft →
Companies using SAP PI/PO →
ipaas enterprise integration ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP PI/PO is named by 186 companies in job postings and MuleSoft by 972; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/mulesoft-vs-sap-pi-po)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
MuleSoft vs SAP PI/PO: questions
Which is more used, MuleSoft or SAP PI/PO?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, MuleSoft (972) over SAP PI/PO (186). By website-and-DNS footprint, MuleSoft (270 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses MuleSoft?
30% of MuleSoft companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 26% for SAP PI/PO. 44% of MuleSoft companies have over 1,000 employees, against 56% for SAP PI/PO.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually MuleSoft in marketing and SAP PI/PO in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on MuleSoft or SAP PI/PO. Start free, no card.