Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · api specs data formats

OData VS Protocol Buffers

As of 30 October 2026, Protocol Buffers is named by 431 companies and OData by 636; OData skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 46%), Protocol Buffers to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 44%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: OData's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Protocol Buffers rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

OData: 2–200 employees
35%
Protocol Buffers: 2–200 employees
46%
OData: 1,000+ employees
44%
Protocol Buffers: 1,000+ employees
26%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.8 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
636companies name OData
431companies name Protocol Buffers
0name both
2,434 · 904postings in 90 days, OData · Protocol Buffers
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentODatashareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
Self-employed20%61%even
2-10 employees427%379%even
11-50 employees7912%6114%even
51-200 employees10016%9923%Protocol Buffers
201-500 employees7111%7317%Protocol Buffers
501-1000 employees599%4110%even
1001-5000 employees10416%6515%even
5001-10000 employees477%133%OData
10,001+ employees13221%368%OData
By industry
SegmentODatashareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
Technology & software26942%20548%Protocol Buffers
Manufacturing & industry13321%7718%OData
Business & finance services9214%7918%Protocol Buffers
Commerce & trade356%92%OData
Utilities & infrastructure223%82%even
Automotive213%41%OData
Property & construction132%––outside top 12
Health care112%31%even
Media & content112%184%Protocol Buffers
Public, community & associations91%61%even
Consumer services & leisure81%61%even
Transport, logistics & rental81%123%even
Hospitality & travel––20%outside top 12
By country
SegmentODatashareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
United States27143%28867%Protocol Buffers
Germany12119%256%OData
United Kingdom437%327%even
India254%72%OData
France203%92%even
Canada193%61%even
Switzerland183%41%even
Australia173%––outside top 12
Netherlands163%41%even
Belgium61%––outside top 12
Czechia61%––outside top 12
Denmark61%––outside top 12
Japan––51%outside top 12
Poland––51%outside top 12
Sweden––51%outside top 12
Brazil––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentODatashareProtocol BuffersshareLeans
IT operations & business systems1,51651%302%OData
Software engineering88029%94075%Protocol Buffers
Data & AI913%1079%Protocol Buffers
Product, program & project management221%50%even
General management & consulting201%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)90%343%Protocol Buffers
Sales50%20%even
Unclassified50%10%even
Customer service & success40%40%even
Human resources30%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications30%40%even
Quality, safety & environment30%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting––20%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––10%outside top 12
Construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Protocol Buffers is named by 431 companies in job postings and OData by 636; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/odata-vs-protocol-buffers)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

OData vs Protocol Buffers: questions

Which is more used, OData or Protocol Buffers?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, OData (636) over Protocol Buffers (431). By website-and-DNS footprint, Protocol Buffers (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses OData?

35% of OData companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Protocol Buffers. 44% of OData companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for Protocol Buffers.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually OData in marketing and Protocol Buffers in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on OData or Protocol Buffers. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market