Okuma VS SIMATIC S5
As of 30 October 2026, SIMATIC S5 is named by 113 companies and Okuma by 208; Okuma skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 34%), SIMATIC S5 to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Okuma's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SIMATIC S5 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Okuma: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- SIMATIC S5: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Okuma: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- SIMATIC S5: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Okuma | share | SIMATIC S5 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 5% | 9 | 8% | SIMATIC S5 |
| 11-50 employees | 18 | 9% | 10 | 9% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 56 | 27% | 19 | 17% | Okuma |
| 201-500 employees | 45 | 22% | 15 | 13% | Okuma |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 8% | 10 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 24 | 12% | 21 | 19% | SIMATIC S5 |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 5% | 7 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 28 | 13% | 21 | 19% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Okuma | share | SIMATIC S5 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 163 | 78% | 71 | 63% | Okuma |
| Automotive | 15 | 7% | 4 | 4% | Okuma |
| Commerce & trade | 8 | 4% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business & finance services | 3 | 1% | 7 | 6% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 1% | 5 | 4% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Technology & software | 3 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 7 | 6% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 0% | 6 | 5% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Okuma | share | SIMATIC S5 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 147 | 71% | 27 | 24% | Okuma |
| Germany | 24 | 12% | 54 | 48% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Canada | 7 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% | 5 | 4% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | 4 | 4% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Poland | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Türkiye | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 0% | 5 | 4% | SIMATIC S5 |
| France | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Okuma | share | SIMATIC S5 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and production | 641 | 78% | 2 | 1% | Okuma |
| Skilled trades and field service | 72 | 9% | 182 | 66% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 34 | 4% | 35 | 13% | SIMATIC S5 |
| Sales | 16 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Okuma →
Companies using SIMATIC S5 →
plc programming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SIMATIC S5 is named by 113 companies in job postings and Okuma by 208; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/okuma-vs-simatic-s5)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Okuma vs SIMATIC S5: questions
Which is more used, Okuma or SIMATIC S5?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Okuma (208) over SIMATIC S5 (113). By website-and-DNS footprint, SIMATIC S5 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Okuma?
40% of Okuma companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for SIMATIC S5. 30% of Okuma companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for SIMATIC S5.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Okuma in marketing and SIMATIC S5 in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Okuma or SIMATIC S5. Start free, no card.