Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · model serving gateways

Ollama VS Text Generation Inference

As of 30 October 2026, Text Generation Inference is named by 108 companies and Ollama by 145; Ollama skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 50%), Text Generation Inference to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ollama's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Text Generation Inference rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Ollama: 2–200 employees
46%
Text Generation Inference: 2–200 employees
50%
Ollama: 1,000+ employees
28%
Text Generation Inference: 1,000+ employees
25%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.3 · 2.8
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
145companies name Ollama
108companies name Text Generation Inference
29name both
337 · 301postings in 90 days, Ollama · Text Generation Inference
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentOllamashareText Generation InferenceshareLeans
Self-employed11%22%even
2-10 employees139%1413%Text Generation Inference
11-50 employees2920%1918%Ollama
51-200 employees2417%2119%Text Generation Inference
201-500 employees2014%1716%even
501-1000 employees1812%87%Ollama
1001-5000 employees2618%1312%Ollama
5001-10000 employees43%76%Text Generation Inference
10,001+ employees107%76%even
By industry
SegmentOllamashareText Generation InferenceshareLeans
Technology & software7854%6762%Text Generation Inference
Business & finance services2819%1413%Ollama
Manufacturing & industry128%1110%even
Public, community & associations64%55%even
Commerce & trade53%––outside top 12
Media & content43%33%even
Utilities & infrastructure43%22%even
Automotive21%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure21%33%even
Health care21%11%even
Property & construction11%11%even
Transport, logistics & rental11%11%even
By country
SegmentOllamashareText Generation InferenceshareLeans
United States7451%7065%Text Generation Inference
Germany2014%––outside top 12
United Kingdom96%1211%Text Generation Inference
India96%33%Ollama
France75%22%Ollama
Austria32%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates21%11%even
Canada21%22%even
Czechia21%––outside top 12
Spain21%22%even
Italy21%––outside top 12
Singapore21%22%even
Brazil––44%outside top 12
Australia––11%outside top 12
Switzerland––11%outside top 12
Cyprus––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentOllamashareText Generation InferenceshareLeans
Data & AI22654%21655%even
Software engineering10324%6517%Ollama
IT operations & business systems215%31%Ollama
Product, program & project management92%10%even
Engineering (non-software)61%41%even
Sales31%92%even
Marketing & communications20%369%Text Generation Inference
Arts media and entertainment10%––outside top 12
Education & training10%––outside top 12
General management & consulting10%21%even
Research and science10%––outside top 12
Unclassified10%––outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––103%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––31%outside top 12
Customer service & success––21%outside top 12
Human resources––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Text Generation Inference is named by 108 companies in job postings and Ollama by 145; 29 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ollama-vs-text-generation-inference)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Ollama vs Text Generation Inference: questions

Which is more used, Ollama or Text Generation Inference?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ollama (145) over Text Generation Inference (108). By website-and-DNS footprint, Text Generation Inference (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Ollama?

46% of Ollama companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for Text Generation Inference. 28% of Ollama companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for Text Generation Inference.

Do companies run both?

29 companies name both in their postings, usually Ollama in marketing and Text Generation Inference in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Ollama or Text Generation Inference. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market