Onshape VS PTC Creo
As of 30 October 2026, PTC Creo is named by 1,290 companies and Onshape by 160; Onshape skews to companies under 200 people (75% vs 38%), PTC Creo to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 7%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Onshape's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PTC Creo rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Onshape: 2–200 employees
- 75%
- PTC Creo: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Onshape: 1,000+ employees
- 7%
- PTC Creo: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 5.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Onshape | share | PTC Creo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 3% | 6 | 0% | Onshape |
| 2-10 employees | 36 | 23% | 93 | 7% | Onshape |
| 11-50 employees | 44 | 28% | 142 | 11% | Onshape |
| 51-200 employees | 40 | 25% | 252 | 20% | Onshape |
| 201-500 employees | 15 | 9% | 192 | 15% | PTC Creo |
| 501-1000 employees | 10 | 6% | 120 | 9% | PTC Creo |
| 1001-5000 employees | 1 | 1% | 210 | 16% | PTC Creo |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 4% | 72 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 4 | 3% | 203 | 16% | PTC Creo |
| Segment | Onshape | share | PTC Creo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 76 | 48% | 729 | 57% | PTC Creo |
| Technology & software | 30 | 19% | 138 | 11% | Onshape |
| Business & finance services | 13 | 8% | 152 | 12% | PTC Creo |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 7% | 17 | 1% | Onshape |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 5% | 19 | 1% | Onshape |
| Automotive | 5 | 3% | 89 | 7% | PTC Creo |
| Property & construction | 5 | 3% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 36 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 44 | 3% | PTC Creo |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Onshape | share | PTC Creo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 125 | 78% | 779 | 60% | Onshape |
| Germany | 8 | 5% | 139 | 11% | PTC Creo |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% | 50 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 3% | 20 | 2% | even |
| France | 3 | 2% | 44 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 22 | 2% | even |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 1 | 1% | 31 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | – | – | 21 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 20 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 19 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Onshape | share | PTC Creo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 312 | 76% | 6,774 | 80% | PTC Creo |
| Software engineering | 13 | 3% | 62 | 1% | Onshape |
| Sales | 10 | 2% | 100 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 8 | 2% | 74 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 5 | 1% | 117 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 17 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 92 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | 89 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 98 | 1% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | 42 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 23 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 15 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Onshape →
Companies using PTC Creo →
mechanical cad ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
PTC Creo is named by 1,290 companies in job postings and Onshape by 160; 46 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/onshape-vs-ptc-creo)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Onshape vs PTC Creo: questions
Which is more used, Onshape or PTC Creo?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, PTC Creo (1,290) over Onshape (160). By website-and-DNS footprint, PTC Creo (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Onshape?
75% of Onshape companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for PTC Creo. 7% of Onshape companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for PTC Creo.
Do companies run both?
46 companies name both in their postings, usually Onshape in marketing and PTC Creo in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Onshape or PTC Creo. Start free, no card.