OPC UA VS PROFIBUS
As of 30 October 2026, PROFIBUS is named by 549 companies and OPC UA by 723; OPC UA skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 25%), PROFIBUS to companies over 1,000 (51% vs 40%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: OPC UA's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PROFIBUS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- OPC UA: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- PROFIBUS: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- OPC UA: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- PROFIBUS: 1,000+ employees
- 51%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | OPC UA | share | PROFIBUS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 55 | 8% | 27 | 5% | OPC UA |
| 11-50 employees | 92 | 13% | 50 | 9% | OPC UA |
| 51-200 employees | 114 | 16% | 59 | 11% | OPC UA |
| 201-500 employees | 92 | 13% | 58 | 11% | OPC UA |
| 501-1000 employees | 76 | 11% | 74 | 13% | PROFIBUS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 107 | 15% | 98 | 18% | PROFIBUS |
| 5001-10000 employees | 51 | 7% | 43 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 132 | 18% | 139 | 25% | PROFIBUS |
| Segment | OPC UA | share | PROFIBUS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 327 | 45% | 307 | 56% | PROFIBUS |
| Technology & software | 132 | 18% | 21 | 4% | OPC UA |
| Business & finance services | 72 | 10% | 52 | 9% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 63 | 9% | 39 | 7% | even |
| Property & construction | 31 | 4% | 32 | 6% | even |
| Automotive | 26 | 4% | 27 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 21 | 3% | 25 | 5% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 21 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 9 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 3 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Segment | OPC UA | share | PROFIBUS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 357 | 49% | 246 | 45% | OPC UA |
| Germany | 112 | 15% | 88 | 16% | even |
| United Kingdom | 35 | 5% | 43 | 8% | PROFIBUS |
| France | 30 | 4% | 23 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 19 | 3% | 15 | 3% | even |
| Spain | 16 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 15 | 2% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 13 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 13 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 13 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 11 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 11 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | OPC UA | share | PROFIBUS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 807 | 37% | 1,029 | 54% | PROFIBUS |
| Software engineering | 371 | 17% | 149 | 8% | OPC UA |
| IT operations & business systems | 252 | 11% | 32 | 2% | OPC UA |
| Data & AI | 85 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 59 | 3% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 43 | 2% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 27 | 1% | 396 | 21% | PROFIBUS |
| General management & consulting | 10 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 8 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 7 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using OPC UA →
Companies using PROFIBUS →
iot platforms protocols ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
PROFIBUS is named by 549 companies in job postings and OPC UA by 723; 110 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/opc-ua-vs-profibus)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
OPC UA vs PROFIBUS: questions
Which is more used, OPC UA or PROFIBUS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, OPC UA (723) over PROFIBUS (549). By website-and-DNS footprint, PROFIBUS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses OPC UA?
36% of OPC UA companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 25% for PROFIBUS. 40% of OPC UA companies have over 1,000 employees, against 51% for PROFIBUS.
Do companies run both?
110 companies name both in their postings, usually OPC UA in marketing and PROFIBUS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on OPC UA or PROFIBUS. Start free, no card.