Oracle GoldenGate VS Toad
As of 30 October 2026, Toad is named by 143 companies and Oracle GoldenGate by 131; Oracle GoldenGate skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 52%), Toad to companies over 1,000 (28% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Oracle GoldenGate's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Toad rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Oracle GoldenGate: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- Toad: 2–200 employees
- 52%
- Oracle GoldenGate: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Toad: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Oracle GoldenGate | share | Toad | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 3 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 17% | 24 | 17% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 36 | 27% | 45 | 31% | Toad |
| 201-500 employees | 16 | 12% | 16 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 6% | 12 | 8% | Toad |
| 1001-5000 employees | 16 | 12% | 8 | 6% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 7% | 9 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 19 | 15% | 23 | 16% | even |
| Segment | Oracle GoldenGate | share | Toad | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 74 | 56% | 76 | 53% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| Business & finance services | 20 | 15% | 28 | 20% | Toad |
| Manufacturing & industry | 11 | 8% | 14 | 10% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 5% | 2 | 1% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 6 | 4% | Toad |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Oracle GoldenGate | share | Toad | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 69% | 114 | 80% | Toad |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% | 3 | 2% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| Singapore | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| France | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| India | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Romania | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Toad |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Cyprus | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| EG | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| NG | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Oracle GoldenGate | share | Toad | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 290 | 56% | 179 | 24% | Oracle GoldenGate |
| Data & AI | 56 | 11% | 100 | 14% | Toad |
| Software engineering | 52 | 10% | 256 | 35% | Toad |
| Research and science | 30 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 8 | 2% | 23 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 25 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Oracle GoldenGate →
Companies using Toad →
database tools ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Toad is named by 143 companies in job postings and Oracle GoldenGate by 131; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/oracle-goldengate-vs-toad)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Oracle GoldenGate vs Toad: questions
Which is more used, Oracle GoldenGate or Toad?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Toad (143) over Oracle GoldenGate (131). By website-and-DNS footprint, Toad (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Oracle GoldenGate?
47% of Oracle GoldenGate companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 52% for Toad. 34% of Oracle GoldenGate companies have over 1,000 employees, against 28% for Toad.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Oracle GoldenGate in marketing and Toad in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Oracle GoldenGate or Toad. Start free, no card.