Ping Identity VS SAML
As of 30 October 2026, SAML is named by 1,712 companies and Ping Identity by 209; Ping Identity skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 38%), SAML to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 54%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ping Identity's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAML rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ping Identity: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- SAML: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Ping Identity: 1,000+ employees
- 54%
- SAML: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.7 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ping Identity | share | SAML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 17 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 13 | 6% | 119 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 15 | 7% | 188 | 11% | SAML |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 12% | 336 | 20% | SAML |
| 201-500 employees | 20 | 10% | 240 | 14% | SAML |
| 501-1000 employees | 20 | 10% | 161 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 51 | 24% | 311 | 18% | Ping Identity |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 7% | 102 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 47 | 22% | 238 | 14% | Ping Identity |
| Segment | Ping Identity | share | SAML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 104 | 50% | 937 | 55% | SAML |
| Business & finance services | 58 | 28% | 320 | 19% | Ping Identity |
| Manufacturing & industry | 15 | 7% | 135 | 8% | even |
| Media & content | 9 | 4% | 39 | 2% | Ping Identity |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 2% | 41 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 37 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 2% | 36 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 2% | 48 | 3% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 0% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 0% | 25 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 28 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 38 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ping Identity | share | SAML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 146 | 70% | 1,176 | 69% | even |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 6% | 113 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 4% | 70 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 7 | 3% | 39 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 2% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 49 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | – | – | 24 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 23 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ping Identity | share | SAML | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 535 | 55% | 2,594 | 44% | Ping Identity |
| Software engineering | 140 | 14% | 1,826 | 31% | SAML |
| Sales | 54 | 6% | 220 | 4% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 42 | 4% | 179 | 3% | even |
| Customer service & success | 29 | 3% | 224 | 4% | even |
| Construction and civil | 4 | 0% | 9 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 0% | 78 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 2 | 0% | 77 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 14 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ping Identity →
Companies using SAML →
Identity ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAML is named by 1,712 companies in job postings and Ping Identity by 209; 262 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ping-identity-vs-saml)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ping Identity vs SAML: questions
Which is more used, Ping Identity or SAML?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAML (1,712) over Ping Identity (209). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAML (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ping Identity?
25% of Ping Identity companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for SAML. 54% of Ping Identity companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for SAML.
Do companies run both?
262 companies name both in their postings, usually Ping Identity in marketing and SAML in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ping Identity or SAML. Start free, no card.