proALPHA VS SAP CO-PA
As of 30 October 2026, SAP CO-PA is named by 171 companies and proALPHA by 104; proALPHA skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 19%), SAP CO-PA to companies over 1,000 (67% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: proALPHA's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP CO-PA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- proALPHA: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- SAP CO-PA: 2–200 employees
- 19%
- proALPHA: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- SAP CO-PA: 1,000+ employees
- 67%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.8 · 3.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | proALPHA | share | SAP CO-PA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 6 | 6% | 9 | 5% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 33 | 32% | 20 | 12% | proALPHA |
| 201-500 employees | 28 | 27% | 15 | 9% | proALPHA |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 14% | 10 | 6% | proALPHA |
| 1001-5000 employees | 13 | 13% | 35 | 20% | SAP CO-PA |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 14 | 8% | SAP CO-PA |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 5% | 65 | 38% | SAP CO-PA |
| Segment | proALPHA | share | SAP CO-PA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 81 | 78% | 74 | 43% | proALPHA |
| Automotive | 4 | 4% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 4% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Business & finance services | 3 | 3% | 16 | 9% | SAP CO-PA |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 3% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | 2 | 2% | 28 | 16% | SAP CO-PA |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 7 | 4% | SAP CO-PA |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 9 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | proALPHA | share | SAP CO-PA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 85 | 82% | 27 | 16% | proALPHA |
| Austria | 6 | 6% | 6 | 4% | proALPHA |
| United States | 6 | 6% | 84 | 49% | SAP CO-PA |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| France | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% | 15 | 9% | SAP CO-PA |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 8 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Canada | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hungary | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | proALPHA | share | SAP CO-PA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance & accounting | 45 | 18% | 111 | 16% | proALPHA |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 40 | 16% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 31 | 12% | 451 | 63% | SAP CO-PA |
| Procurement and purchasing | 17 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 12 | 5% | 3 | 0% | proALPHA |
| Engineering (non-software) | 10 | 4% | 25 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 4% | 11 | 2% | proALPHA |
| Skilled trades and field service | 8 | 3% | 5 | 1% | proALPHA |
| Manufacturing and production | 7 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 6 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 4 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using proALPHA →
Companies using SAP CO-PA →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP CO-PA is named by 171 companies in job postings and proALPHA by 104; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/proalpha-vs-sap-co-pa)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
proALPHA vs SAP CO-PA: questions
Which is more used, proALPHA or SAP CO-PA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAP CO-PA (171) over proALPHA (104). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP CO-PA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses proALPHA?
39% of proALPHA companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 19% for SAP CO-PA. 19% of proALPHA companies have over 1,000 employees, against 67% for SAP CO-PA.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually proALPHA in marketing and SAP CO-PA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on proALPHA or SAP CO-PA. Start free, no card.