QAD VS Sage 100
As of 30 October 2026, Sage 100 is named by 152 companies and QAD by 135; QAD skews to companies under 200 people (11% vs 60%), Sage 100 to companies over 1,000 (10% vs 64%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: QAD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sage 100 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- QAD: 2–200 employees
- 11%
- Sage 100: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- QAD: 1,000+ employees
- 64%
- Sage 100: 1,000+ employees
- 10%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | QAD | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 1% | 10 | 7% | Sage 100 |
| 11-50 employees | 1 | 1% | 33 | 22% | Sage 100 |
| 51-200 employees | 12 | 9% | 48 | 32% | Sage 100 |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 13% | 35 | 23% | Sage 100 |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 12% | 11 | 7% | QAD |
| 1001-5000 employees | 32 | 24% | 9 | 6% | QAD |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 11% | 1 | 1% | QAD |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 29% | 5 | 3% | QAD |
| Segment | QAD | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 93 | 69% | 49 | 32% | QAD |
| Automotive | 15 | 11% | 1 | 1% | QAD |
| Business & finance services | 8 | 6% | 19 | 13% | Sage 100 |
| Technology & software | 4 | 3% | 14 | 9% | Sage 100 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 10 | 7% | Sage 100 |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 7 | 5% | Sage 100 |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 17 | 11% | Sage 100 |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 21 | 14% | Sage 100 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QAD | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 99 | 73% | 92 | 61% | QAD |
| Canada | 7 | 5% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 6 | 4% | 33 | 22% | Sage 100 |
| France | 4 | 3% | 18 | 12% | Sage 100 |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| CM | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| MA | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QAD | share | Sage 100 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 122 | 22% | 20 | 6% | QAD |
| Finance & accounting | 86 | 15% | 159 | 45% | Sage 100 |
| IT operations & business systems | 44 | 8% | 44 | 13% | Sage 100 |
| Procurement and purchasing | 42 | 8% | 5 | 1% | QAD |
| Engineering (non-software) | 33 | 6% | 3 | 1% | QAD |
| Manufacturing and production | 30 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 27 | 5% | 4 | 1% | QAD |
| Quality, safety & environment | 17 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 14 | 3% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 13 | 2% | 17 | 5% | Sage 100 |
| Sales | 12 | 2% | 23 | 7% | Sage 100 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 11 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 9 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using QAD →
Companies using Sage 100 →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sage 100 is named by 152 companies in job postings and QAD by 135; 1 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/qad-vs-sage-100)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
QAD vs Sage 100: questions
Which is more used, QAD or Sage 100?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Sage 100 (152) over QAD (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sage 100 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses QAD?
11% of QAD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 60% for Sage 100. 64% of QAD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 10% for Sage 100.
Do companies run both?
1 companies name both in their postings, usually QAD in marketing and Sage 100 in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on QAD or Sage 100. Start free, no card.