QAD VS SAP FI/CO
As of 30 October 2026, SAP FI/CO is named by 1,212 companies and QAD by 135; QAD skews to companies under 200 people (11% vs 21%), SAP FI/CO to companies over 1,000 (59% vs 64%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: QAD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP FI/CO rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- QAD: 2–200 employees
- 11%
- SAP FI/CO: 2–200 employees
- 21%
- QAD: 1,000+ employees
- 64%
- SAP FI/CO: 1,000+ employees
- 59%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 5.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | QAD | share | SAP FI/CO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 1% | 48 | 4% | SAP FI/CO |
| 11-50 employees | 1 | 1% | 95 | 8% | SAP FI/CO |
| 51-200 employees | 12 | 9% | 112 | 9% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 13% | 114 | 9% | QAD |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 12% | 121 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 32 | 24% | 278 | 23% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 11% | 125 | 10% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 29% | 315 | 26% | QAD |
| Self-employed | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QAD | share | SAP FI/CO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 93 | 69% | 408 | 34% | QAD |
| Automotive | 15 | 11% | 54 | 4% | QAD |
| Business & finance services | 8 | 6% | 143 | 12% | SAP FI/CO |
| Technology & software | 4 | 3% | 245 | 20% | SAP FI/CO |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 3% | 28 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 84 | 7% | SAP FI/CO |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 27 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 46 | 4% | SAP FI/CO |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 40 | 3% | SAP FI/CO |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 62 | 5% | SAP FI/CO |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 28 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QAD | share | SAP FI/CO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 99 | 73% | 424 | 35% | QAD |
| Canada | 7 | 5% | 22 | 2% | QAD |
| Germany | 6 | 4% | 318 | 26% | SAP FI/CO |
| France | 4 | 3% | 55 | 5% | even |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% | 70 | 6% | SAP FI/CO |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | 30 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 38 | 3% | SAP FI/CO |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 43 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 23 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 17 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QAD | share | SAP FI/CO | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 122 | 22% | 18 | 0% | QAD |
| Finance & accounting | 86 | 15% | 1,305 | 16% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 44 | 8% | 4,805 | 60% | SAP FI/CO |
| Procurement and purchasing | 42 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 33 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 30 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 27 | 5% | 21 | 0% | QAD |
| Quality, safety & environment | 17 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 14 | 3% | 88 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 13 | 2% | 226 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 12 | 2% | 64 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 9 | 2% | 39 | 0% | even |
| Software engineering | – | – | 324 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 182 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 67 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 15 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using QAD →
Companies using SAP FI/CO →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP FI/CO is named by 1,212 companies in job postings and QAD by 135; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/qad-vs-sap-fi-co)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
QAD vs SAP FI/CO: questions
Which is more used, QAD or SAP FI/CO?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAP FI/CO (1,212) over QAD (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP FI/CO (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses QAD?
11% of QAD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 21% for SAP FI/CO. 64% of QAD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 59% for SAP FI/CO.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually QAD in marketing and SAP FI/CO in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on QAD or SAP FI/CO. Start free, no card.