QNX VS Yocto Project
As of 4 November 2026, Yocto Project is named by 638 companies and QNX by 186; QNX skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 48%), Yocto Project to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 37%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: QNX's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Yocto Project rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- QNX: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Yocto Project: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- QNX: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Yocto Project: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.8 · 2.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | QNX | share | Yocto Project | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 17 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 15 | 8% | 78 | 12% | Yocto Project |
| 11-50 employees | 29 | 16% | 87 | 14% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 33 | 18% | 139 | 22% | Yocto Project |
| 201-500 employees | 20 | 11% | 88 | 14% | Yocto Project |
| 501-1000 employees | 17 | 9% | 45 | 7% | QNX |
| 1001-5000 employees | 19 | 10% | 75 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 14 | 8% | 23 | 4% | QNX |
| 10,001+ employees | 36 | 19% | 86 | 13% | QNX |
| Segment | QNX | share | Yocto Project | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 60 | 32% | 312 | 49% | Yocto Project |
| Technology & software | 56 | 30% | 148 | 23% | QNX |
| Automotive | 30 | 16% | 23 | 4% | QNX |
| Business & finance services | 22 | 12% | 70 | 11% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 21 | 3% | Yocto Project |
| Property & construction | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QNX | share | Yocto Project | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 107 | 58% | 335 | 53% | QNX |
| Germany | 15 | 8% | 56 | 9% | even |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 6% | 34 | 5% | even |
| France | 10 | 5% | 27 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| India | 5 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 5 | 3% | 30 | 5% | Yocto Project |
| Austria | 3 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| China | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | QNX | share | Yocto Project | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 813 | 67% | 1,396 | 79% | Yocto Project |
| Engineering (non-software) | 76 | 6% | 73 | 4% | QNX |
| IT operations & business systems | 47 | 4% | 86 | 5% | even |
| Data & AI | 37 | 3% | 10 | 1% | QNX |
| Product, program & project management | 18 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 12 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 4 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using QNX →
Companies using Yocto Project →
embedded os rtos ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Yocto Project is named by 638 companies in job postings and QNX by 186; 48 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/qnx-vs-yocto-project)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
QNX vs Yocto Project: questions
Which is more used, QNX or Yocto Project?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Yocto Project (638) over QNX (186). By website-and-DNS footprint, Yocto Project (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses QNX?
41% of QNX companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for Yocto Project. 37% of QNX companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for Yocto Project.
Do companies run both?
48 companies name both in their postings, usually QNX in marketing and Yocto Project in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on QNX or Yocto Project. Start free, no card.