React Router VS SharePoint Framework (SPFx)
As of 30 October 2026, SharePoint Framework (SPFx) is named by 102 companies and React Router by 115; React Router skews to companies under 200 people (65% vs 36%), SharePoint Framework (SPFx) to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 15%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: React Router's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SharePoint Framework (SPFx) rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- React Router: 2–200 employees
- 65%
- SharePoint Framework (SPFx): 2–200 employees
- 36%
- React Router: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- SharePoint Framework (SPFx): 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | React Router | share | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 20 | 17% | 2 | 2% | React Router |
| 11-50 employees | 32 | 28% | 14 | 14% | React Router |
| 51-200 employees | 23 | 20% | 21 | 21% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 14 | 12% | 20 | 20% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 6% | 17 | 17% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| 1001-5000 employees | 8 | 7% | 9 | 9% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 3% | 7 | 7% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 4% | 11 | 11% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Segment | React Router | share | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 72 | 63% | 52 | 51% | React Router |
| Business & finance services | 19 | 17% | 22 | 22% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 5% | 2 | 2% | React Router |
| Manufacturing & industry | 5 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 5 | 5% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | React Router | share | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 59% | 55 | 54% | React Router |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% | 7 | 7% | even |
| India | 7 | 6% | 7 | 7% | even |
| Germany | 6 | 5% | 8 | 8% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| France | 3 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Japan | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Norway | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 4 | 4% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Belgium | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | React Router | share | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 282 | 91% | 121 | 30% | React Router |
| Data & AI | 7 | 2% | 1 | 0% | React Router |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 1 | 0% | 207 | 52% | SharePoint Framework (SPFx) |
| Design & UX | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using React Router →
Companies using SharePoint Framework (SPFx) →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SharePoint Framework (SPFx) is named by 102 companies in job postings and React Router by 115; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/react-router-vs-sharepoint-framework)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
React Router vs SharePoint Framework (SPFx): questions
Which is more used, React Router or SharePoint Framework (SPFx)?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, React Router (115) over SharePoint Framework (SPFx) (102). By website-and-DNS footprint, SharePoint Framework (SPFx) (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses React Router?
65% of React Router companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for SharePoint Framework (SPFx). 15% of React Router companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for SharePoint Framework (SPFx).
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually React Router in marketing and SharePoint Framework (SPFx) in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on React Router or SharePoint Framework (SPFx). Start free, no card.