React Router VS TanStack
As of 30 October 2026, TanStack is named by 100 companies and React Router by 115; React Router skews to companies under 200 people (65% vs 69%), TanStack to companies over 1,000 (13% vs 15%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: React Router's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, TanStack rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- React Router: 2–200 employees
- 65%
- TanStack: 2–200 employees
- 69%
- React Router: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- TanStack: 1,000+ employees
- 13%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 1.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | React Router | share | TanStack | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 7 | 7% | TanStack |
| 2-10 employees | 20 | 17% | 19 | 19% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 32 | 28% | 34 | 34% | TanStack |
| 51-200 employees | 23 | 20% | 16 | 16% | React Router |
| 201-500 employees | 14 | 12% | 8 | 8% | React Router |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 6% | 3 | 3% | React Router |
| 1001-5000 employees | 8 | 7% | 5 | 5% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 4% | 6 | 6% | even |
| Segment | React Router | share | TanStack | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 72 | 63% | 67 | 67% | TanStack |
| Business & finance services | 19 | 17% | 13 | 13% | React Router |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 5% | 2 | 2% | React Router |
| Manufacturing & industry | 5 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | React Router | share | TanStack | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 59% | 50 | 50% | React Router |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% | 8 | 8% | even |
| India | 7 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 6 | 5% | 13 | 13% | TanStack |
| France | 3 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Norway | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | TanStack |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | React Router | share | TanStack | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 282 | 91% | 165 | 80% | React Router |
| Data & AI | 7 | 2% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 1 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using React Router →
Companies using TanStack →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
TanStack is named by 100 companies in job postings and React Router by 115; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/react-router-vs-tanstack)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
React Router vs TanStack: questions
Which is more used, React Router or TanStack?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, React Router (115) over TanStack (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, TanStack (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses React Router?
65% of React Router companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 69% for TanStack. 15% of React Router companies have over 1,000 employees, against 13% for TanStack.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually React Router in marketing and TanStack in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on React Router or TanStack. Start free, no card.