Red Hat Satellite VS Windows Server Update Services
As of 30 October 2026, Windows Server Update Services is named by 210 companies and Red Hat Satellite by 155; Red Hat Satellite skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 34%), Windows Server Update Services to companies over 1,000 (41% vs 40%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Red Hat Satellite's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Windows Server Update Services rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Red Hat Satellite: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- Windows Server Update Services: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Red Hat Satellite: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Windows Server Update Services: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Red Hat Satellite | share | Windows Server Update Services | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 3% | 9 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 21 | 14% | 17 | 8% | Red Hat Satellite |
| 51-200 employees | 28 | 18% | 46 | 22% | Windows Server Update Services |
| 201-500 employees | 23 | 15% | 32 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 13 | 8% | 16 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 27 | 17% | 45 | 21% | Windows Server Update Services |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 8% | 6 | 3% | Red Hat Satellite |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 14% | 35 | 17% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Segment | Red Hat Satellite | share | Windows Server Update Services | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 73 | 47% | 65 | 31% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Business & finance services | 29 | 19% | 44 | 21% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Manufacturing & industry | 26 | 17% | 35 | 17% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 15 | 7% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Media & content | 4 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 7 | 3% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 12 | 6% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 8 | 4% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Red Hat Satellite | share | Windows Server Update Services | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 63% | 113 | 54% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Germany | 13 | 8% | 18 | 9% | even |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% | 10 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 4 | 3% | 17 | 8% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 2 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| BD | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Red Hat Satellite | share | Windows Server Update Services | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 440 | 61% | 608 | 73% | Windows Server Update Services |
| Engineering (non-software) | 72 | 10% | 60 | 7% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Software engineering | 62 | 9% | 27 | 3% | Red Hat Satellite |
| Education & training | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 6 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Red Hat Satellite →
Companies using Windows Server Update Services →
endpoint management uem ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Windows Server Update Services is named by 210 companies in job postings and Red Hat Satellite by 155; 19 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/red-hat-satellite-vs-windows-server-update-services)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Red Hat Satellite vs Windows Server Update Services: questions
Which is more used, Red Hat Satellite or Windows Server Update Services?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Windows Server Update Services (210) over Red Hat Satellite (155). By website-and-DNS footprint, Windows Server Update Services (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Red Hat Satellite?
35% of Red Hat Satellite companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Windows Server Update Services. 40% of Red Hat Satellite companies have over 1,000 employees, against 41% for Windows Server Update Services.
Do companies run both?
19 companies name both in their postings, usually Red Hat Satellite in marketing and Windows Server Update Services in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Red Hat Satellite or Windows Server Update Services. Start free, no card.