Rhinoceros 3D VS V-Ray
As of 30 October 2026, V-Ray is named by 213 companies and Rhinoceros 3D by 733; Rhinoceros 3D skews to companies under 200 people (52% vs 55%), V-Ray to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 24%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Rhinoceros 3D's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, V-Ray rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Rhinoceros 3D: 2–200 employees
- 52%
- V-Ray: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- Rhinoceros 3D: 1,000+ employees
- 24%
- V-Ray: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.1 · 6.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Rhinoceros 3D | share | V-Ray | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 61 | 8% | 20 | 9% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 160 | 22% | 62 | 29% | V-Ray |
| 51-200 employees | 157 | 21% | 36 | 17% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| 201-500 employees | 118 | 16% | 24 | 11% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| 501-1000 employees | 53 | 7% | 21 | 10% | V-Ray |
| 1001-5000 employees | 94 | 13% | 25 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 3% | 11 | 5% | V-Ray |
| 10,001+ employees | 61 | 8% | 14 | 7% | even |
| Segment | Rhinoceros 3D | share | V-Ray | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property & construction | 201 | 27% | 76 | 36% | V-Ray |
| Business & finance services | 172 | 23% | 49 | 23% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 133 | 18% | 22 | 10% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Commerce & trade | 43 | 6% | 11 | 5% | even |
| Automotive | 37 | 5% | 1 | 0% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Technology & software | 37 | 5% | 6 | 3% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Consumer services & leisure | 33 | 5% | 18 | 8% | V-Ray |
| Public, community & associations | 25 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 21 | 3% | 12 | 6% | V-Ray |
| Hospitality & travel | 11 | 2% | 8 | 4% | V-Ray |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Rhinoceros 3D | share | V-Ray | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 391 | 53% | 97 | 46% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Germany | 61 | 8% | 5 | 2% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| United Kingdom | 50 | 7% | 22 | 10% | V-Ray |
| Italy | 28 | 4% | 9 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 24 | 3% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 24 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 20 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| India | 19 | 3% | 22 | 10% | V-Ray |
| Spain | 14 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 12 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Greece | 9 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 9 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Rhinoceros 3D | share | V-Ray | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 1,450 | 38% | 1,167 | 72% | V-Ray |
| Construction and civil | 762 | 20% | 131 | 8% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Engineering (non-software) | 688 | 18% | 78 | 5% | Rhinoceros 3D |
| Product, program & project management | 50 | 1% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Agriculture and environment | 28 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 24 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 22 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 22 | 1% | 7 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 22 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 17 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Rhinoceros 3D →
Companies using V-Ray →
3d modeling rendering ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
V-Ray is named by 213 companies in job postings and Rhinoceros 3D by 733; 108 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/rhinoceros-3d-vs-v-ray)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Rhinoceros 3D vs V-Ray: questions
Which is more used, Rhinoceros 3D or V-Ray?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Rhinoceros 3D (733) over V-Ray (213). By website-and-DNS footprint, V-Ray (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Rhinoceros 3D?
52% of Rhinoceros 3D companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for V-Ray. 24% of Rhinoceros 3D companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for V-Ray.
Do companies run both?
108 companies name both in their postings, usually Rhinoceros 3D in marketing and V-Ray in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Rhinoceros 3D or V-Ray. Start free, no card.