Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · plc programming

Rockwell Automation VS Structured Text

As of 30 October 2026, Structured Text is named by 206 companies and Rockwell Automation by 993; Rockwell Automation skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 38%), Structured Text to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 47%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Rockwell Automation's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Structured Text rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Rockwell Automation: 2–200 employees
27%
Structured Text: 2–200 employees
38%
Rockwell Automation: 1,000+ employees
47%
Structured Text: 1,000+ employees
36%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.0 · 1.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
993companies name Rockwell Automation
206companies name Structured Text
76name both
2,994 · 392postings in 90 days, Rockwell Automation · Structured Text
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentRockwell AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
Self-employed30%21%even
2-10 employees404%126%even
11-50 employees788%3115%Structured Text
51-200 employees14915%3617%Structured Text
201-500 employees14114%3015%even
501-1000 employees11411%2010%even
1001-5000 employees19520%3417%Rockwell Automation
5001-10000 employees818%126%Rockwell Automation
10,001+ employees19219%2914%Rockwell Automation
By industry
SegmentRockwell AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry60661%12259%even
Business & finance services9710%136%Rockwell Automation
Technology & software586%136%even
Utilities & infrastructure545%136%even
Commerce & trade424%73%even
Property & construction414%94%even
Automotive384%157%Structured Text
Media & content131%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure101%21%even
Public, community & associations91%52%even
Transport, logistics & rental91%31%even
Agriculture & forestry71%10%even
Health care––31%outside top 12
By country
SegmentRockwell AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
United States67668%11958%Rockwell Automation
Germany505%2110%Structured Text
Canada475%105%even
United Kingdom455%73%even
France444%73%even
Italy232%63%even
Australia131%21%even
Netherlands111%73%Structured Text
Brazil101%––outside top 12
Denmark91%31%even
Spain81%––outside top 12
Austria71%––outside top 12
Norway––31%outside top 12
Bulgaria––21%outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentRockwell AutomationshareStructured TextshareLeans
Engineering (non-software)2,28559%33868%Structured Text
Skilled trades and field service61016%296%Rockwell Automation
Software engineering983%7315%Structured Text
IT operations & business systems972%41%even
Quality, safety & environment662%31%even
Sales602%41%even
Product, program & project management511%10%even
Manufacturing and production401%10%even
Construction and civil331%10%even
Business development & strategy160%––outside top 12
Customer service & success140%10%even
Data & AI100%10%even
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Structured Text is named by 206 companies in job postings and Rockwell Automation by 993; 76 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/rockwell-automation-vs-structured-text)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Rockwell Automation vs Structured Text: questions

Which is more used, Rockwell Automation or Structured Text?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Rockwell Automation (993) over Structured Text (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, Structured Text (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Rockwell Automation?

27% of Rockwell Automation companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Structured Text. 47% of Rockwell Automation companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Structured Text.

Do companies run both?

76 companies name both in their postings, usually Rockwell Automation in marketing and Structured Text in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Rockwell Automation or Structured Text. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market