Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

RTP VS Spanning Tree Protocol

As of 30 October 2026, Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies and RTP by 314; RTP skews to companies under 200 people (43% vs 35%), Spanning Tree Protocol to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 35%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: RTP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spanning Tree Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

RTP: 2–200 employees
43%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
RTP: 1,000+ employees
35%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
314companies name RTP
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
0name both
821 · 747postings in 90 days, RTP · Spanning Tree Protocol
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentRTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed31%31%even
2-10 employees258%125%RTP
11-50 employees4514%2511%RTP
51-200 employees6521%4519%even
201-500 employees3511%3113%Spanning Tree Protocol
501-1000 employees3010%167%RTP
1001-5000 employees5016%4118%even
5001-10000 employees206%2310%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees4113%3816%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentRTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software11637%10344%Spanning Tree Protocol
Business & finance services9631%3515%RTP
Manufacturing & industry3110%3013%Spanning Tree Protocol
Utilities & infrastructure155%156%even
Hospitality & travel124%––outside top 12
Media & content114%104%even
Public, community & associations83%42%even
Consumer services & leisure72%94%even
Commerce & trade41%42%even
Health care41%52%even
Property & construction41%73%even
Transport, logistics & rental41%52%even
Automotive––52%outside top 12
By country
SegmentRTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
United States23475%14763%RTP
Canada155%63%RTP
United Kingdom114%83%even
Germany72%156%Spanning Tree Protocol
Australia52%––outside top 12
Austria41%––outside top 12
Switzerland41%31%even
Spain41%––outside top 12
France41%136%Spanning Tree Protocol
Italy41%73%even
India21%94%Spanning Tree Protocol
PK21%––outside top 12
Brazil––52%outside top 12
Japan––31%outside top 12
Netherlands––21%outside top 12
Sweden––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentRTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Software engineering27826%959%RTP
IT operations & business systems15615%60959%Spanning Tree Protocol
Product, program & project management626%61%RTP
Engineering (non-software)616%222%RTP
Finance & accounting485%10%RTP
Customer service & success333%323%even
Data & AI273%––outside top 12
Sales252%374%even
Hospitality and food service182%––outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service182%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment131%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk121%10%even
General management & consulting––61%outside top 12
Design & UX––20%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies in job postings and RTP by 314; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/rtp-vs-spanning-tree-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

RTP vs Spanning Tree Protocol: questions

Which is more used, RTP or Spanning Tree Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, RTP (314) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spanning Tree Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses RTP?

43% of RTP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Spanning Tree Protocol. 35% of RTP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Spanning Tree Protocol.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually RTP in marketing and Spanning Tree Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on RTP or Spanning Tree Protocol. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market