SAP Adobe Forms VS SAP CDS Views
As of 30 October 2026, SAP CDS Views is named by 262 companies and SAP Adobe Forms by 119; SAP Adobe Forms skews to companies under 200 people (29% vs 26%), SAP CDS Views to companies over 1,000 (53% vs 46%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: SAP Adobe Forms's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP CDS Views rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- SAP Adobe Forms: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- SAP CDS Views: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- SAP Adobe Forms: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- SAP CDS Views: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 3.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | SAP Adobe Forms | share | SAP CDS Views | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 4% | 12 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 12% | 21 | 8% | SAP Adobe Forms |
| 51-200 employees | 16 | 13% | 36 | 14% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 18% | 30 | 11% | SAP Adobe Forms |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 7% | 25 | 10% | SAP CDS Views |
| 1001-5000 employees | 22 | 18% | 45 | 17% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 10% | 23 | 9% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 21 | 18% | 70 | 27% | SAP CDS Views |
| Segment | SAP Adobe Forms | share | SAP CDS Views | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 52 | 44% | 90 | 34% | SAP Adobe Forms |
| Manufacturing & industry | 30 | 25% | 70 | 27% | even |
| Business & finance services | 15 | 13% | 33 | 13% | even |
| Automotive | 6 | 5% | 14 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 3% | 17 | 6% | SAP CDS Views |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 9 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 8 | 3% | SAP CDS Views |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | SAP Adobe Forms | share | SAP CDS Views | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 36% | 106 | 40% | SAP CDS Views |
| Germany | 23 | 19% | 57 | 22% | SAP CDS Views |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 8% | 17 | 6% | even |
| India | 7 | 6% | 13 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 4% | 6 | 2% | even |
| France | 5 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 4 | 3% | 3 | 1% | SAP Adobe Forms |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% | 12 | 5% | SAP CDS Views |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | SAP Adobe Forms | share | SAP CDS Views | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 302 | 68% | 816 | 66% | even |
| Software engineering | 70 | 16% | 197 | 16% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality and food service | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | – | – | 63 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using SAP Adobe Forms →
Companies using SAP CDS Views →
erp technical platforms ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP CDS Views is named by 262 companies in job postings and SAP Adobe Forms by 119; 98 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/sap-adobe-forms-vs-sap-cds-views)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
SAP Adobe Forms vs SAP CDS Views: questions
Which is more used, SAP Adobe Forms or SAP CDS Views?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAP CDS Views (262) over SAP Adobe Forms (119). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP CDS Views (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses SAP Adobe Forms?
29% of SAP Adobe Forms companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 26% for SAP CDS Views. 46% of SAP Adobe Forms companies have over 1,000 employees, against 53% for SAP CDS Views.
Do companies run both?
98 companies name both in their postings, usually SAP Adobe Forms in marketing and SAP CDS Views in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on SAP Adobe Forms or SAP CDS Views. Start free, no card.