Siemens STEP 7 VS TwinCAT
As of 30 October 2026, TwinCAT is named by 210 companies and Siemens STEP 7 by 363; Siemens STEP 7 skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 45%), TwinCAT to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 42%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Siemens STEP 7's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, TwinCAT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Siemens STEP 7: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- TwinCAT: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Siemens STEP 7: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- TwinCAT: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 1.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Siemens STEP 7 | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 28 | 8% | 21 | 10% | TwinCAT |
| 11-50 employees | 39 | 11% | 32 | 15% | TwinCAT |
| 51-200 employees | 60 | 17% | 42 | 20% | TwinCAT |
| 201-500 employees | 47 | 13% | 31 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 36 | 10% | 13 | 6% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| 1001-5000 employees | 51 | 14% | 27 | 13% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 24 | 7% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 77 | 21% | 31 | 15% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| Segment | Siemens STEP 7 | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 210 | 58% | 133 | 63% | TwinCAT |
| Business & finance services | 33 | 9% | 15 | 7% | even |
| Property & construction | 21 | 6% | 5 | 2% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| Automotive | 20 | 6% | 14 | 7% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 20 | 6% | 12 | 6% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 16 | 4% | 5 | 2% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| Public, community & associations | 12 | 3% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Technology & software | 12 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Siemens STEP 7 | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 134 | 37% | 87 | 41% | TwinCAT |
| United States | 102 | 28% | 72 | 34% | TwinCAT |
| France | 20 | 6% | 3 | 1% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| Austria | 13 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 4% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 11 | 3% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 9 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 8 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 8 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Siemens STEP 7 | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 408 | 45% | 328 | 60% | TwinCAT |
| Skilled trades and field service | 312 | 34% | 66 | 12% | Siemens STEP 7 |
| Software engineering | 24 | 3% | 80 | 15% | TwinCAT |
| Social care and community | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Siemens STEP 7 →
Companies using TwinCAT →
plc programming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
TwinCAT is named by 210 companies in job postings and Siemens STEP 7 by 363; 24 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/siemens-step-7-vs-twincat)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Siemens STEP 7 vs TwinCAT: questions
Which is more used, Siemens STEP 7 or TwinCAT?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Siemens STEP 7 (363) over TwinCAT (210). By website-and-DNS footprint, TwinCAT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Siemens STEP 7?
35% of Siemens STEP 7 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 45% for TwinCAT. 42% of Siemens STEP 7 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for TwinCAT.
Do companies run both?
24 companies name both in their postings, usually Siemens STEP 7 in marketing and TwinCAT in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Siemens STEP 7 or TwinCAT. Start free, no card.