Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

SIP VS Spanning Tree Protocol

As of 30 October 2026, Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies and SIP by 449; SIP skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 35%), Spanning Tree Protocol to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 32%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: SIP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spanning Tree Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

SIP: 2–200 employees
47%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
SIP: 1,000+ employees
32%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.0 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
449companies name SIP
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
0name both
1,350 · 747postings in 90 days, SIP · Spanning Tree Protocol
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentSIPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed41%31%even
2-10 employees429%125%SIP
11-50 employees7016%2511%SIP
51-200 employees9922%4519%SIP
201-500 employees5512%3113%even
501-1000 employees368%167%even
1001-5000 employees6414%4118%Spanning Tree Protocol
5001-10000 employees286%2310%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees5111%3816%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentSIPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software24855%10344%SIP
Business & finance services5412%3515%Spanning Tree Protocol
Utilities & infrastructure5412%156%SIP
Manufacturing & industry317%3013%Spanning Tree Protocol
Health care133%52%even
Media & content112%104%even
Public, community & associations102%42%even
Consumer services & leisure92%94%even
Property & construction72%73%even
Transport, logistics & rental51%52%even
Commerce & trade41%42%even
Automotive20%52%even
By country
SegmentSIPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
United States26860%14763%Spanning Tree Protocol
United Kingdom256%83%SIP
Germany245%156%even
Canada184%63%even
France174%136%even
India92%94%even
Australia82%––outside top 12
Italy82%73%even
Switzerland61%31%even
Poland61%––outside top 12
Austria51%––outside top 12
Belgium51%––outside top 12
Brazil––52%outside top 12
Japan––31%outside top 12
Netherlands––21%outside top 12
Sweden––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentSIPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
IT operations & business systems49627%60959%Spanning Tree Protocol
Software engineering34919%959%SIP
Engineering (non-software)22612%222%SIP
Customer service & success855%323%even
Sales674%374%even
Data & AI442%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management382%61%even
Skilled trades and field service221%––outside top 12
Construction and civil50%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting50%10%even
General management & consulting50%61%even
Manufacturing and production50%––outside top 12
Design & UX––20%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies in job postings and SIP by 449; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/sip-vs-spanning-tree-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

SIP vs Spanning Tree Protocol: questions

Which is more used, SIP or Spanning Tree Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, SIP (449) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spanning Tree Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses SIP?

47% of SIP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Spanning Tree Protocol. 32% of SIP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Spanning Tree Protocol.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually SIP in marketing and Spanning Tree Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on SIP or Spanning Tree Protocol. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market