Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

Spanning Tree Protocol VS UDP

As of 30 October 2026, UDP is named by 331 companies and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; Spanning Tree Protocol skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 47%), UDP to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 44%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Spanning Tree Protocol's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, UDP rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
UDP: 2–200 employees
47%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
UDP: 1,000+ employees
29%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.2 · 2.4
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
331companies name UDP
0name both
747 · 810postings in 90 days, Spanning Tree Protocol · UDP
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareUDPshareLeans
Self-employed31%52%even
2-10 employees125%185%even
11-50 employees2511%6018%UDP
51-200 employees4519%7623%UDP
201-500 employees3113%4714%even
501-1000 employees167%309%UDP
1001-5000 employees4118%5115%Spanning Tree Protocol
5001-10000 employees2310%124%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees3816%3210%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareUDPshareLeans
Technology & software10344%10833%Spanning Tree Protocol
Business & finance services3515%6620%UDP
Manufacturing & industry3013%9729%UDP
Utilities & infrastructure156%113%Spanning Tree Protocol
Media & content104%93%even
Consumer services & leisure94%93%even
Property & construction73%31%Spanning Tree Protocol
Automotive52%52%even
Health care52%41%even
Transport, logistics & rental52%62%even
Commerce & trade42%31%even
Public, community & associations42%93%even
By country
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareUDPshareLeans
United States14763%19459%Spanning Tree Protocol
Germany156%268%even
France136%113%Spanning Tree Protocol
India94%124%even
United Kingdom83%196%UDP
Italy73%––outside top 12
Canada63%103%even
Brazil52%––outside top 12
Switzerland31%41%even
Japan31%––outside top 12
Netherlands21%52%even
Sweden21%52%even
Poland––52%outside top 12
Singapore––52%outside top 12
Austria––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareUDPshareLeans
IT operations & business systems60959%14812%Spanning Tree Protocol
Software engineering959%72860%UDP
Sales374%40%Spanning Tree Protocol
Customer service & success323%181%even
Engineering (non-software)222%1149%UDP
General management & consulting61%30%even
Product, program & project management61%71%even
Design & UX20%––outside top 12
Human resources20%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment20%101%even
Finance & accounting10%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk10%––outside top 12
Data & AI––121%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––71%outside top 12
Education & training––30%outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service––30%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

UDP is named by 331 companies in job postings and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/spanning-tree-protocol-vs-udp)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Spanning Tree Protocol vs UDP: questions

Which is more used, Spanning Tree Protocol or UDP?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, UDP (331) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, UDP (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Spanning Tree Protocol?

35% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for UDP. 44% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for UDP.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Spanning Tree Protocol in marketing and UDP in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Spanning Tree Protocol or UDP. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market