Spanning Tree Protocol VS WebSocket
As of 30 October 2026, WebSocket is named by 1,160 companies and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; Spanning Tree Protocol skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 61%), WebSocket to companies over 1,000 (18% vs 44%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Spanning Tree Protocol's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, WebSocket rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- WebSocket: 2–200 employees
- 61%
- Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- WebSocket: 1,000+ employees
- 18%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.2 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Spanning Tree Protocol | share | WebSocket | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 33 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 5% | 161 | 14% | WebSocket |
| 11-50 employees | 25 | 11% | 272 | 23% | WebSocket |
| 51-200 employees | 45 | 19% | 277 | 24% | WebSocket |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 13% | 128 | 11% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 7% | 75 | 6% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 41 | 18% | 116 | 10% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 10% | 28 | 2% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| 10,001+ employees | 38 | 16% | 70 | 6% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Segment | Spanning Tree Protocol | share | WebSocket | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 103 | 44% | 668 | 58% | WebSocket |
| Business & finance services | 35 | 15% | 219 | 19% | WebSocket |
| Manufacturing & industry | 30 | 13% | 106 | 9% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 6% | 19 | 2% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Media & content | 10 | 4% | 42 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 4% | 29 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 7 | 3% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 5 | 2% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 2% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 2% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Spanning Tree Protocol | share | WebSocket | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 147 | 63% | 688 | 59% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Germany | 15 | 6% | 59 | 5% | even |
| France | 13 | 6% | 26 | 2% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| India | 9 | 4% | 65 | 6% | even |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 3% | 90 | 8% | WebSocket |
| Italy | 7 | 3% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 26 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Japan | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 25 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 11 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Spanning Tree Protocol | share | WebSocket | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 609 | 59% | 61 | 2% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Software engineering | 95 | 9% | 2,688 | 80% | WebSocket |
| Sales | 37 | 4% | 15 | 0% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Customer service & success | 32 | 3% | 20 | 1% | Spanning Tree Protocol |
| Engineering (non-software) | 22 | 2% | 55 | 2% | even |
| General management & consulting | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 1% | 25 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 2 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 200 | 6% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Spanning Tree Protocol →
Companies using WebSocket →
network protocols ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
WebSocket is named by 1,160 companies in job postings and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/spanning-tree-protocol-vs-websocket)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Spanning Tree Protocol vs WebSocket: questions
Which is more used, Spanning Tree Protocol or WebSocket?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, WebSocket (1,160) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, WebSocket (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Spanning Tree Protocol?
35% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 61% for WebSocket. 44% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have over 1,000 employees, against 18% for WebSocket.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Spanning Tree Protocol in marketing and WebSocket in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Spanning Tree Protocol or WebSocket. Start free, no card.