Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

Spanning Tree Protocol VS Wi-Fi

As of 30 October 2026, Wi-Fi is named by 688 companies and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; Spanning Tree Protocol skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 44%), Wi-Fi to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 44%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Spanning Tree Protocol's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Wi-Fi rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
Wi-Fi: 2–200 employees
44%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Wi-Fi: 1,000+ employees
31%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.2 · 2.4
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
688companies name Wi-Fi
22name both
747 · 1,680postings in 90 days, Spanning Tree Protocol · Wi-Fi
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareWi-FishareLeans
Self-employed31%61%even
2-10 employees125%436%even
11-50 employees2511%9714%Wi-Fi
51-200 employees4519%16324%Wi-Fi
201-500 employees3113%9614%even
501-1000 employees167%7210%Wi-Fi
1001-5000 employees4118%9914%Spanning Tree Protocol
5001-10000 employees2310%355%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees3816%7711%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareWi-FishareLeans
Technology & software10344%21031%Spanning Tree Protocol
Business & finance services3515%8713%Spanning Tree Protocol
Manufacturing & industry3013%15422%Wi-Fi
Utilities & infrastructure156%406%even
Media & content104%172%even
Consumer services & leisure94%233%even
Property & construction73%294%even
Automotive52%213%even
Health care52%183%even
Transport, logistics & rental52%183%even
Commerce & trade42%406%Wi-Fi
Public, community & associations42%193%even
By country
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareWi-FishareLeans
United States14763%30144%Spanning Tree Protocol
Germany156%183%Spanning Tree Protocol
France136%8512%Wi-Fi
India94%223%even
United Kingdom83%355%even
Italy73%193%even
Canada63%345%Wi-Fi
Brazil52%274%even
Switzerland31%––outside top 12
Japan31%––outside top 12
Netherlands21%142%even
Sweden21%183%even
Poland––172%outside top 12
Spain––142%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentSpanning Tree ProtocolshareWi-FishareLeans
IT operations & business systems60959%69030%Spanning Tree Protocol
Software engineering959%58725%Wi-Fi
Sales374%803%even
Customer service & success323%261%even
Engineering (non-software)222%37916%Wi-Fi
General management & consulting61%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management61%663%Wi-Fi
Design & UX20%––outside top 12
Human resources20%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment20%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting10%161%even
Legal, compliance & risk10%181%even
Skilled trades and field service––482%outside top 12
Data & AI––141%outside top 12
Healthcare clinical––121%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––110%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Wi-Fi is named by 688 companies in job postings and Spanning Tree Protocol by 234; 22 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/spanning-tree-protocol-vs-wi-fi)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Spanning Tree Protocol vs Wi-Fi: questions

Which is more used, Spanning Tree Protocol or Wi-Fi?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Wi-Fi (688) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Wi-Fi (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Spanning Tree Protocol?

35% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for Wi-Fi. 44% of Spanning Tree Protocol companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Wi-Fi.

Do companies run both?

22 companies name both in their postings, usually Spanning Tree Protocol in marketing and Wi-Fi in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Spanning Tree Protocol or Wi-Fi. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market