Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · plc programming

Structured Text VS Studio 5000

As of 30 October 2026, Studio 5000 is named by 436 companies and Structured Text by 206; Structured Text skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 21%), Studio 5000 to companies over 1,000 (52% vs 36%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Structured Text's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Studio 5000 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Structured Text: 2–200 employees
38%
Studio 5000: 2–200 employees
21%
Structured Text: 1,000+ employees
36%
Studio 5000: 1,000+ employees
52%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.9 · 2.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
206companies name Structured Text
436companies name Studio 5000
34name both
392 · 1,015postings in 90 days, Structured Text · Studio 5000
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentStructured TextshareStudio 5000shareLeans
Self-employed21%10%even
2-10 employees126%143%Structured Text
11-50 employees3115%215%Structured Text
51-200 employees3617%5813%Structured Text
201-500 employees3015%6816%even
501-1000 employees2010%4811%even
1001-5000 employees3417%9522%Studio 5000
5001-10000 employees126%399%Studio 5000
10,001+ employees2914%9221%Studio 5000
By industry
SegmentStructured TextshareStudio 5000shareLeans
Manufacturing & industry12259%26861%Studio 5000
Automotive157%368%even
Business & finance services136%317%even
Technology & software136%113%Structured Text
Utilities & infrastructure136%297%even
Property & construction94%194%even
Commerce & trade73%246%Studio 5000
Public, community & associations52%61%even
Health care31%20%even
Transport, logistics & rental31%31%even
Consumer services & leisure21%20%even
Agriculture & forestry10%20%even
By country
SegmentStructured TextshareStudio 5000shareLeans
United States11958%32073%Studio 5000
Germany2110%164%Structured Text
Canada105%225%even
France73%153%even
United Kingdom73%194%even
Netherlands73%––outside top 12
Italy63%––outside top 12
Denmark31%31%even
Norway31%––outside top 12
Australia21%41%even
Bulgaria21%––outside top 12
Switzerland21%41%even
Austria––41%outside top 12
Brazil––31%outside top 12
Spain––31%outside top 12
Poland––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentStructured TextshareStudio 5000shareLeans
Engineering (non-software)33868%84266%Structured Text
Software engineering7315%232%Structured Text
Skilled trades and field service296%27421%Studio 5000
IT operations & business systems41%101%even
Sales41%40%even
Quality, safety & environment31%––outside top 12
Construction and civil10%20%even
Customer service & success10%10%even
Data & AI10%10%even
Manufacturing and production10%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management10%50%even
Education & training––30%outside top 12
Facilities cleaning and security––10%outside top 12
Finance & accounting––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Studio 5000 is named by 436 companies in job postings and Structured Text by 206; 34 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/structured-text-vs-studio-5000)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Structured Text vs Studio 5000: questions

Which is more used, Structured Text or Studio 5000?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Studio 5000 (436) over Structured Text (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, Studio 5000 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Structured Text?

38% of Structured Text companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 21% for Studio 5000. 36% of Structured Text companies have over 1,000 employees, against 52% for Studio 5000.

Do companies run both?

34 companies name both in their postings, usually Structured Text in marketing and Studio 5000 in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Structured Text or Studio 5000. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market