Swift Package Manager VS Yarn
As of 30 October 2026, Yarn is named by 178 companies and Swift Package Manager by 205; Swift Package Manager skews to companies under 200 people (29% vs 59%), Yarn to companies over 1,000 (24% vs 53%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Swift Package Manager's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Yarn rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Swift Package Manager: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Yarn: 2–200 employees
- 59%
- Swift Package Manager: 1,000+ employees
- 53%
- Yarn: 1,000+ employees
- 24%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.4 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Swift Package Manager | share | Yarn | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 6% | 13 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 8% | 50 | 28% | Yarn |
| 51-200 employees | 31 | 15% | 42 | 24% | Yarn |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 9% | 19 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 8% | 9 | 5% | Swift Package Manager |
| 1001-5000 employees | 36 | 18% | 21 | 12% | Swift Package Manager |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 6% | 6 | 3% | Swift Package Manager |
| 10,001+ employees | 61 | 30% | 16 | 9% | Swift Package Manager |
| Segment | Swift Package Manager | share | Yarn | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 74 | 36% | 109 | 61% | Yarn |
| Business & finance services | 38 | 19% | 34 | 19% | even |
| Health care | 25 | 12% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | 16 | 8% | 10 | 6% | Swift Package Manager |
| Media & content | 10 | 5% | 5 | 3% | Swift Package Manager |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Swift Package Manager |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 3% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Swift Package Manager |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Swift Package Manager |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Swift Package Manager | share | Yarn | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 130 | 63% | 92 | 52% | Swift Package Manager |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 3% | 6 | 3% | even |
| France | 6 | 3% | 6 | 3% | even |
| India | 6 | 3% | 10 | 6% | Yarn |
| Australia | 5 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Japan | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| MY | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 6 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Slovakia | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| BD | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Swift Package Manager | share | Yarn | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 360 | 40% | 277 | 38% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 190 | 21% | 30 | 4% | Swift Package Manager |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 60 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 39 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 38 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 3% | 7 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 19 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 8 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 8 | 1% | 312 | 43% | Yarn |
| Sales | 7 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 6 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Swift Package Manager →
Companies using Yarn →
build packaging ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Yarn is named by 178 companies in job postings and Swift Package Manager by 205; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/swift-package-manager-vs-yarn)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Swift Package Manager vs Yarn: questions
Which is more used, Swift Package Manager or Yarn?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Swift Package Manager (205) over Yarn (178). By website-and-DNS footprint, Yarn (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Swift Package Manager?
29% of Swift Package Manager companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 59% for Yarn. 53% of Swift Package Manager companies have over 1,000 employees, against 24% for Yarn.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Swift Package Manager in marketing and Yarn in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Swift Package Manager or Yarn. Start free, no card.