TanStack Query VS Visualforce
As of 30 October 2026, Visualforce is named by 424 companies and TanStack Query by 392; TanStack Query skews to companies under 200 people (60% vs 41%), Visualforce to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 16%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: TanStack Query's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Visualforce rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- TanStack Query: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- Visualforce: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- TanStack Query: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Visualforce: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.7 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | TanStack Query | share | Visualforce | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 14 | 4% | 2 | 0% | TanStack Query |
| 2-10 employees | 61 | 16% | 21 | 5% | TanStack Query |
| 11-50 employees | 97 | 25% | 62 | 15% | TanStack Query |
| 51-200 employees | 79 | 20% | 90 | 21% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 52 | 13% | 62 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 28 | 7% | 33 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 38 | 10% | 78 | 18% | Visualforce |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 2% | 24 | 6% | Visualforce |
| 10,001+ employees | 16 | 4% | 52 | 12% | Visualforce |
| Segment | TanStack Query | share | Visualforce | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 239 | 61% | 229 | 54% | TanStack Query |
| Business & finance services | 67 | 17% | 81 | 19% | Visualforce |
| Media & content | 21 | 5% | 7 | 2% | TanStack Query |
| Manufacturing & industry | 14 | 4% | 45 | 11% | Visualforce |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 8 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 1% | 12 | 3% | Visualforce |
| Segment | TanStack Query | share | Visualforce | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 216 | 55% | 289 | 68% | Visualforce |
| Germany | 29 | 7% | 12 | 3% | TanStack Query |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 7% | 26 | 6% | even |
| India | 20 | 5% | 24 | 6% | even |
| France | 13 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 10 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 5 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | TanStack Query | share | Visualforce | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 837 | 93% | 1,518 | 78% | TanStack Query |
| Data & AI | 8 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 3 | 0% | 255 | 13% | Visualforce |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using TanStack Query →
Companies using Visualforce →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Visualforce is named by 424 companies in job postings and TanStack Query by 392; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/tanstack-query-vs-visualforce)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
TanStack Query vs Visualforce: questions
Which is more used, TanStack Query or Visualforce?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Visualforce (424) over TanStack Query (392). By website-and-DNS footprint, Visualforce (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses TanStack Query?
60% of TanStack Query companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Visualforce. 16% of TanStack Query companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Visualforce.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually TanStack Query in marketing and Visualforce in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on TanStack Query or Visualforce. Start free, no card.