Azure Firewall alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 network security zero trust are named by companies instead of Azure Firewall: Fortinet by 1,679 companies, Palo Alto Networks by 1,661, FortiGate by 706.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- Azure Firewall, companies in postings
- 201
- Most used alternative
- Fortinet · 1,679
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Palo Alto Networks
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
network security zero trust companies choose instead of Azure Firewall
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs Azure Firewall | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FortinetFortinet | 1,679 | 835% | 4,276 | Azure Firewall vs Fortinet → | |
| 2 | Palo Alto NetworksPalo Alto Networks | 1,661 | 826% | 5,027 | Azure Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks → | |
| 3 | FortiGateFortinet | 706 | 351% | 1,452 | Azure Firewall vs FortiGate → | |
| 4 | Check PointCheck Point Software Technologies | 607 | 302% | 1,797 | Azure Firewall vs Check Point → | |
| 5 | 514 | 256% | 1,389 | Azure Firewall vs Cisco Identity Services Engine → | ||
| 6 | Cisco ASACisco | 443 | 220% | 920 | Azure Firewall vs Cisco ASA → | |
| 7 | ZscalerZscaler | 436 | 217% | 1,331 | Azure Firewall vs Zscaler → | |
| 8 | SophosSophos | 317 | 158% | 619 | Azure Firewall vs Sophos → | |
| 9 | Palo Alto FirewallsPalo Alto Networks | 294 | 146% | 645 | Azure Firewall vs Palo Alto Firewalls → | |
| 10 | Palo Alto PanoramaPalo Alto Networks | 209 | 104% | 653 | Azure Firewall vs Palo Alto Panorama → | |
| 11 | Cisco FirepowerCisco | 203 | 101% | 475 | Azure Firewall vs Cisco Firepower → | |
| 12 | SonicWallSonicWall | 174 | 87% | 343 | Azure Firewall vs SonicWall → | |
| 13 | Aruba ClearPassHPE Aruba | 147 | 73% | 409 | Azure Firewall vs Aruba ClearPass → | |
| 14 | NetskopeNetskope | 139 | 69% | 474 | Azure Firewall vs Netskope → | |
| 15 | FortiManagerFortinet | 128 | 64% | 270 | Azure Firewall vs FortiManager → | |
| 16 | iptablesNetfilter | 117 | 58% | 199 | soon | |
| 17 | SnortCisco | 103 | 51% | 204 | soon | |
| 18 | Zscaler Private AccessZscaler | 102 | 51% | 292 | soon | |
| 19 | AWS WAFAmazon Web Services | 100 | 50% | 223 | soon | |
| 20 | SuricataOISF | 94 | 47% | 224 | soon | |
| 21 | Zscaler Internet AccessZscaler | 93 | 46% | 294 | soon | |
| 22 | 92 | 46% | 253 | soon | ||
| 23 | Juniper SRXJuniper Networks | 88 | 44% | 217 | soon | |
| 24 | pfSenseNetgate | 86 | 43% | 138 | soon | |
| 25 | WatchGuardWatchGuard | 86 | 43% | 174 | soon | |
| 26 | 84 | 42% | 164 | soon | ||
| 27 | Prisma AccessPalo Alto Networks | 84 | 42% | 371 | soon | |
| 28 | ZeekZeek Project | 80 | 40% | 223 | soon | |
| 29 | DarktraceDarktrace | 66 | 33% | 234 | soon | |
| 30 | Nozomi NetworksNozomi Networks | 63 | 31% | 215 | soon | |
| 31 | ClarotyClaroty | 62 | 31% | 185 | soon | |
| 32 | 62 | 31% | 166 | soon | ||
| 33 | Palo Alto ExpeditionPalo Alto Networks | 61 | 30% | 216 | soon | |
| 34 | Cato NetworksCato Networks | 54 | 27% | 139 | soon | |
| 35 | Cisco UmbrellaCisco | 54 | 27% | 98 | soon | |
| 36 | ImpervaThales | 53 | 26% | 198 | soon | |
| 37 | Blue CoatBroadcom | 49 | 24% | 143 | soon | |
| 38 | ForescoutForescout | 49 | 24% | 166 | soon | |
| 39 | DragosDragos | 47 | 23% | 145 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on Azure Firewall users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 network security zero trust are named by companies instead of Azure Firewall: Fortinet by 1,679 companies, Palo Alto Networks by 1,661, FortiGate by 706, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/azure-firewall/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
Azure Firewall alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to Azure Firewall?
Fortinet: 1,679 companies name it in their own job postings, against 201 for Azure Firewall.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on Azure Firewall
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.