BACnet alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of BACnet: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- BACnet, companies in postings
- 598
- Most used alternative
- Modbus · 2,067
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Modbus
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
iot platforms protocols companies choose instead of BACnet
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs BACnet | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ModbusModbus Organization | 2,067 | 346% | 5,698 | BACnet vs Modbus → | |
| 2 | CAN busISO | 1,760 | 294% | 5,610 | BACnet vs CAN bus → | |
| 3 | SPIMotorola | 1,559 | 261% | 4,935 | BACnet vs SPI → | |
| 4 | I2CNXP | 1,515 | 253% | 4,820 | BACnet vs I2C → | |
| 5 | UART(industry standard) | 1,237 | 207% | 3,224 | BACnet vs UART → | |
| 6 | MQTTOASIS | 1,201 | 201% | 2,656 | BACnet vs MQTT → | |
| 7 | EtherNet/IPODVA | 1,048 | 175% | 2,374 | BACnet vs EtherNet/IP → | |
| 8 | OPC UAOPC Foundation | 935 | 156% | 2,090 | BACnet vs OPC UA → | |
| 9 | PROFINETPROFIBUS & PROFINET International | 914 | 153% | 2,036 | BACnet vs PROFINET → | |
| 10 | PROFIBUSPROFIBUS & PROFINET International | 701 | 117% | 1,645 | BACnet vs PROFIBUS → | |
| 11 | USBUSB Implementers Forum | 597 | 100% | 1,786 | BACnet vs USB → | |
| 12 | Bluetooth Low EnergyBluetooth SIG | 473 | 79% | 934 | BACnet vs Bluetooth Low Energy → | |
| 13 | RS-485TIA | 464 | 78% | 1,001 | BACnet vs RS-485 → | |
| 14 | OPC (OPC UA)OPC Foundation | 451 | 75% | 1,193 | BACnet vs OPC (OPC UA) → | |
| 15 | RS-232EIA | 446 | 75% | 1,038 | BACnet vs RS-232 → | |
| 16 | KNXKNX Association | 401 | 67% | 703 | BACnet vs KNX → | |
| 17 | EtherCATEtherCAT Technology Group | 378 | 63% | 884 | BACnet vs EtherCAT → | |
| 18 | BluetoothBluetooth SIG | 346 | 58% | 659 | BACnet vs Bluetooth → | |
| 19 | IEC 61850IEC | 324 | 54% | 1,126 | BACnet vs IEC 61850 → | |
| 20 | DNP3IEEE | 321 | 54% | 895 | BACnet vs DNP3 → | |
| 21 | DeviceNetODVA | 285 | 48% | 598 | BACnet vs DeviceNet → | |
| 22 | DDS (Data Distribution Service)Object Management Group | 280 | 47% | 663 | BACnet vs DDS (Data Distribution Service) → | |
| 23 | LIN BusLIN Consortium | 266 | 44% | 1,210 | BACnet vs LIN Bus → | |
| 24 | CAN FDBosch | 181 | 30% | 545 | BACnet vs CAN FD → | |
| 25 | RS-422TIA/EIA | 180 | 30% | 607 | BACnet vs RS-422 → | |
| 26 | SAE J1939SAE International | 179 | 30% | 468 | BACnet vs SAE J1939 → | |
| 27 | ZigbeeConnectivity Standards Alliance | 179 | 30% | 427 | BACnet vs Zigbee → | |
| 28 | 175 | 29% | 552 | BACnet vs UDS (ISO 14229) → | ||
| 29 | 168 | 28% | 380 | BACnet vs GPIO → | ||
| 30 | CANopenCAN in Automation | 162 | 27% | 293 | BACnet vs CANopen → | |
| 31 | NFCNFC Forum | 147 | 25% | 366 | BACnet vs NFC → | |
| 32 | DMX512USITT | 122 | 20% | 150 | soon | |
| 33 | LonWorksEchelon | 115 | 19% | 403 | soon | |
| 34 | ARINCSAE ITT | 114 | 19% | 492 | soon | |
| 35 | EcoStruxureSchneider Electric | 109 | 18% | 339 | soon | |
| 36 | LoRaWANLoRa Alliance | 108 | 18% | 185 | soon | |
| 37 | Azure IoT HubMicrosoft | 100 | 17% | 162 | soon | |
| 38 | DALIDiiA | 99 | 17% | 154 | soon | |
| 39 | HART ProtocolFieldComm Group | 99 | 17% | 265 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on BACnet users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 iot platforms protocols are named by companies instead of BACnet: Modbus by 2,067 companies, CAN bus by 1,760, SPI by 1,559, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/bacnet/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
BACnet alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to BACnet?
Modbus: 2,067 companies name it in their own job postings, against 598 for BACnet.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on BACnet
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.