FME alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 etl elt transformation are named by companies instead of FME: Microsoft Power Query by 3,661 companies, Azure Data Factory by 2,199, dbt by 1,758.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- FME, companies in postings
- 166
- Most used alternative
- Microsoft Power Query · 3,661
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Microsoft Power Query
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
etl elt transformation companies choose instead of FME
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs FME | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Power QueryMicrosoft | 3,661 | 2205% | 7,990 | FME vs Microsoft Power Query → | |
| 2 | Azure Data FactoryMicrosoft | 2,199 | 1325% | 5,972 | FME vs Azure Data Factory → | |
| 3 | dbtdbt Labs | 1,758 | 1059% | 4,886 | FME vs dbt → | |
| 4 | SQL Server Integration ServicesMicrosoft | 1,510 | 910% | 3,881 | FME vs SQL Server Integration Services → | |
| 5 | AWS GlueAmazon Web Services | 1,256 | 757% | 3,611 | FME vs AWS Glue → | |
| 6 | InformaticaInformatica | 1,158 | 698% | 3,569 | FME vs Informatica → | |
| 7 | FivetranFivetran | 644 | 388% | 1,173 | FME vs Fivetran → | |
| 8 | TalendQlik | 558 | 336% | 1,386 | FME vs Talend → | |
| 9 | 365 | 220% | 1,334 | FME vs SAP Data Services → | ||
| 10 | Apache NiFiApache Software Foundation | 363 | 219% | 1,401 | FME vs Apache NiFi → | |
| 11 | Salesforce Data LoaderSalesforce | 249 | 150% | 435 | FME vs Salesforce Data Loader → | |
| 12 | 242 | 146% | 1,035 | FME vs IBM DataStage → | ||
| 13 | AirbyteAirbyte | 230 | 139% | 339 | FME vs Airbyte → | |
| 14 | Informatica PowerCenterInformatica | 222 | 134% | 564 | FME vs Informatica PowerCenter → | |
| 15 | DebeziumRed Hat | 207 | 125% | 331 | FME vs Debezium → | |
| 16 | Informatica IDMCInformatica | 195 | 117% | 677 | FME vs Informatica IDMC → | |
| 17 | Delta Live TablesDatabricks | 191 | 115% | 498 | FME vs Delta Live Tables → | |
| 18 | Oracle Data IntegratorOracle | 179 | 108% | 421 | FME vs Oracle Data Integrator → | |
| 19 | DataformGoogle | 168 | 101% | 309 | FME vs Dataform → | |
| 20 | MatillionMatillion | 143 | 86% | 356 | FME vs Matillion → | |
| 21 | dltdltHub | 137 | 83% | 419 | soon | |
| 22 | Kafka ConnectApache Software Foundation | 118 | 71% | 270 | soon | |
| 23 | Apache SqoopApache Software Foundation | 115 | 69% | 145 | soon | |
| 24 | SnowpipeSnowflake | 107 | 64% | 251 | soon | |
| 25 | Dataflows Gen2Microsoft | 100 | 60% | 196 | soon | |
| 26 | PentahoHitachi Vantara | 100 | 60% | 183 | soon | |
| 27 | dbt Clouddbt Labs | 97 | 58% | 168 | soon | |
| 28 | AWS Database Migration ServiceAmazon Web Services | 93 | 56% | 211 | soon | |
| 29 | SAP SLTSAP | 86 | 52% | 280 | soon | |
| 30 | Databricks LakeflowDatabricks | 81 | 49% | 1,511 | soon | |
| 31 | Ab InitioAb Initio Software | 79 | 48% | 747 | soon | |
| 32 | SupermetricsSupermetrics | 75 | 45% | 97 | soon | |
| 33 | Tableau PrepSalesforce | 74 | 45% | 166 | soon | |
| 34 | StitchQlik | 69 | 42% | 173 | soon | |
| 35 | Microsoft Fabric Data FactoryMicrosoft | 68 | 41% | 115 | soon | |
| 36 | Apache FlumeApache Software Foundation | 64 | 39% | 102 | soon | |
| 37 | Google DatastreamGoogle | 57 | 34% | 169 | soon | |
| 38 | SQLMeshTobiko Data | 44 | 27% | 72 | soon | |
| 39 | Qlik ReplicateQlik | 32 | 19% | 87 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on FME users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 etl elt transformation are named by companies instead of FME: Microsoft Power Query by 3,661 companies, Azure Data Factory by 2,199, dbt by 1,758, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/fme/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FME alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to FME?
Microsoft Power Query: 3,661 companies name it in their own job postings, against 166 for FME.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on FME
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.