LDAP alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 identity are named by companies instead of LDAP: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- LDAP, companies in postings
- 1,398
- Most used alternative
- Active Directory · 8,045
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Active Directory
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
Identity companies choose instead of LDAP
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs LDAP | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active DirectoryMicrosoft | 8,045 | 575% | 20,501 | LDAP vs Active Directory → | |
| 2 | Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft | 6,276 | 449% | 16,203 | LDAP vs Microsoft Entra ID → | |
| 3 | OAuthIETF | 4,173 | 298% | 10,994 | LDAP vs OAuth → | |
| 4 | OpenID ConnectOpenID Foundation | 2,634 | 188% | 6,510 | LDAP vs OpenID Connect → | |
| 5 | SAMLOASIS | 2,309 | 165% | 5,573 | LDAP vs SAML → | |
| 6 | JSON Web TokenIETF | 1,752 | 125% | 3,904 | LDAP vs JSON Web Token → | |
| 7 | OktaOkta | 1,656 | 118% | 4,378 | LDAP vs Okta → | |
| 8 | SCIMIETF | 844 | 60% | 1,707 | LDAP vs SCIM → | |
| 9 | KeycloakRed Hat | 558 | 40% | 1,144 | LDAP vs Keycloak → | |
| 10 | KerberosMIT | 451 | 32% | 905 | LDAP vs Kerberos → | |
| 11 | RADIUSIETF | 379 | 27% | 935 | LDAP vs RADIUS → | |
| 12 | Auth0Okta | 347 | 25% | 653 | LDAP vs Auth0 → | |
| 13 | AWS IAMAmazon Web Services | 342 | 24% | 815 | LDAP vs AWS IAM → | |
| 14 | Ping IdentityPing Identity | 281 | 20% | 974 | LDAP vs Ping Identity → | |
| 15 | Amazon CognitoAmazon Web Services | 278 | 20% | 500 | LDAP vs Amazon Cognito → | |
| 16 | Active Directory Federation ServicesMicrosoft | 246 | 18% | 595 | LDAP vs Active Directory Federation Services → | |
| 17 | 239 | 17% | 646 | LDAP vs SAP Identity Authentication Service → | ||
| 18 | Microsoft Entra ConnectMicrosoft | 217 | 16% | 452 | LDAP vs Microsoft Entra Connect → | |
| 19 | RSA SecurIDRSA Security | 204 | 15% | 464 | LDAP vs RSA SecurID → | |
| 20 | FIDO2FIDO Alliance | 198 | 14% | 457 | LDAP vs FIDO2 → | |
| 21 | TACACS+Cisco | 189 | 14% | 404 | LDAP vs TACACS+ → | |
| 22 | AWS OrganizationsAmazon | 172 | 12% | 299 | LDAP vs AWS Organizations → | |
| 23 | Cisco DuoCisco | 156 | 11% | 307 | LDAP vs Cisco Duo → | |
| 24 | Azure Managed IdentityMicrosoft | 154 | 11% | 323 | LDAP vs Azure Managed Identity → | |
| 25 | JumpCloudJumpCloud | 152 | 11% | 230 | LDAP vs JumpCloud → | |
| 26 | PasskeysFIDO Alliance | 138 | 10% | 242 | soon | |
| 27 | WebAuthnW3C | 114 | 8% | 240 | soon | |
| 28 | ForgeRockPing Identity | 108 | 8% | 342 | soon | |
| 29 | Google Cloud IdentityGoogle | 93 | 7% | 263 | soon | |
| 30 | SPIFFECNCF | 79 | 6% | 202 | soon | |
| 31 | PingFederatePing Identity | 63 | 5% | 193 | soon | |
| 32 | OpenStack KeystoneOpenInfra Foundation | 56 | 4% | 113 | soon | |
| 33 | Azure AD B2CMicrosoft | 52 | 4% | 123 | soon | |
| 34 | CA SiteMinderBroadcom | 51 | 4% | 115 | soon | |
| 35 | FreeIPARed Hat | 49 | 4% | 91 | soon | |
| 36 | OneLoginOne Identity | 41 | 3% | 48 | soon | |
| 37 | IdentityServerDuende Software | 40 | 3% | 71 | soon | |
| 38 | Microsoft AuthenticatorMicrosoft | 40 | 3% | 157 | soon | |
| 39 | OpenLDAPOpenLDAP Foundation | 40 | 3% | 99 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on LDAP users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 identity are named by companies instead of LDAP: Active Directory by 8,045 companies, Microsoft Entra ID by 6,276, OAuth by 4,173, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/ldap/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
LDAP alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to LDAP?
Active Directory: 8,045 companies name it in their own job postings, against 1,398 for LDAP.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on LDAP
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.