LoadRunner alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 39 test automation are named by companies instead of LoadRunner: Playwright by 3,573 companies, Selenium by 3,570, Cypress by 2,516.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- LoadRunner, companies in postings
- 370
- Most used alternative
- Playwright · 3,573
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Selenium
- Alternatives ranked
- 39
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
test automation companies choose instead of LoadRunner
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs LoadRunner | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PlaywrightMicrosoft | 3,573 | 966% | 7,835 | LoadRunner vs Playwright → | |
| 2 | SeleniumSoftware Freedom Conservancy | 3,570 | 965% | 10,258 | LoadRunner vs Selenium → | |
| 3 | CypressCypress.io | 2,516 | 680% | 5,145 | LoadRunner vs Cypress → | |
| 4 | Apache JMeterApache Software Foundation | 1,343 | 363% | 2,848 | LoadRunner vs Apache JMeter → | |
| 5 | AppiumOpenJS Foundation | 927 | 251% | 2,522 | LoadRunner vs Appium → | |
| 6 | 897 | 242% | 1,977 | LoadRunner vs REST Assured → | ||
| 7 | Robot FrameworkRobot Framework Foundation | 409 | 111% | 1,154 | LoadRunner vs Robot Framework → | |
| 8 | GatlingGatling Corp | 356 | 96% | 800 | LoadRunner vs Gatling → | |
| 9 | Espresso (Android)Google | 288 | 78% | 485 | LoadRunner vs Espresso (Android) → | |
| 10 | UFT (Unified Functional Testing)OpenText | 258 | 70% | 785 | LoadRunner vs UFT (Unified Functional Testing) → | |
| 11 | k6Grafana Labs | 237 | 64% | 415 | LoadRunner vs k6 → | |
| 12 | LocustLocust | 219 | 59% | 360 | LoadRunner vs Locust → | |
| 13 | Tricentis ToscaTricentis | 194 | 52% | 858 | LoadRunner vs Tricentis Tosca → | |
| 14 | KarateKarate Labs | 173 | 47% | 457 | LoadRunner vs Karate → | |
| 15 | PuppeteerGoogle | 135 | 36% | 208 | LoadRunner vs Puppeteer → | |
| 16 | XCUITestApple | 134 | 36% | 223 | soon | |
| 17 | DetoxWix | 124 | 34% | 187 | soon | |
| 18 | ProtractorAngular team | 118 | 32% | 176 | soon | |
| 19 | ServiceNow Automated Test FrameworkServiceNow | 113 | 31% | 394 | soon | |
| 20 | WebdriverIOOpenJS Foundation | 107 | 29% | 255 | soon | |
| 21 | Allure ReportQameta Software | 106 | 29% | 244 | soon | |
| 22 | KatalonKatalon | 106 | 29% | 275 | soon | |
| 23 | JAWS Screen ReaderFreedom Scientific | 99 | 27% | 318 | soon | |
| 24 | axeDeque Systems | 95 | 26% | 218 | soon | |
| 25 | NVDANV Access | 83 | 22% | 269 | soon | |
| 26 | TestCompleteSmartBear | 80 | 22% | 328 | soon | |
| 27 | NeoLoadTricentis | 63 | 17% | 141 | soon | |
| 28 | ReadyAPISmartBear | 59 | 16% | 145 | soon | |
| 29 | RanorexIdera | 56 | 15% | 145 | soon | |
| 30 | SquishQt Group | 48 | 13% | 136 | soon | |
| 31 | ChromaticChromatic | 46 | 12% | 65 | soon | |
| 32 | FitNesseFitNesse | 42 | 11% | 140 | soon | |
| 33 | ProvarProvar | 36 | 10% | 108 | soon | |
| 34 | ApplitoolsApplitools | 33 | 9% | 227 | soon | |
| 35 | TestCafeDevExpress | 33 | 9% | 84 | soon | |
| 36 | Katalon StudioKatalon | 31 | 8% | 164 | soon | |
| 37 | TestimTricentis | 28 | 8% | 47 | soon | |
| 38 | ACCELQACCELQ | 23 | 6% | 72 | soon | |
| 39 | Selenide | 19 | 5% | 36 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on LoadRunner users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
39 test automation are named by companies instead of LoadRunner: Playwright by 3,573 companies, Selenium by 3,570, Cypress by 2,516, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/loadrunner/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
LoadRunner alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to LoadRunner?
Playwright: 3,573 companies name it in their own job postings, against 370 for LoadRunner.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on LoadRunner
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.