OPA Gatekeeper alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 38 container orchestration are named by companies instead of OPA Gatekeeper: Kubernetes by 14,382 companies, Amazon EKS by 2,864, Helm by 2,714.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- OPA Gatekeeper, companies in postings
- 144
- Most used alternative
- Kubernetes · 14,382
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- Kubernetes
- Alternatives ranked
- 38
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
container orchestration companies choose instead of OPA Gatekeeper
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs OPA Gatekeeper | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KubernetesCloud Native Computing Foundation | 14,382 | 9988% | 77,042 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Kubernetes → | |
| 2 | Amazon EKSAmazon Web Services | 2,864 | 1989% | 7,837 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Amazon EKS → | |
| 3 | HelmCloud Native Computing Foundation | 2,714 | 1885% | 7,555 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Helm → | |
| 4 | Amazon ECSAmazon Web Services | 2,405 | 1670% | 5,926 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Amazon ECS → | |
| 5 | Azure Kubernetes ServiceMicrosoft | 1,602 | 1113% | 4,536 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Azure Kubernetes Service → | |
| 6 | OpenShiftRed Hat | 1,533 | 1065% | 8,233 | OPA Gatekeeper vs OpenShift → | |
| 7 | Google Kubernetes EngineGoogle | 1,069 | 742% | 2,936 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Google Kubernetes Engine → | |
| 8 | IstioIstio | 692 | 481% | 1,543 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Istio → | |
| 9 | RancherSUSE | 316 | 219% | 898 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Rancher → | |
| 10 | KustomizeKubernetes SIG CLI | 299 | 208% | 576 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Kustomize → | |
| 11 | 283 | 197% | 562 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Container Storage Interface → | ||
| 12 | LinkerdCNCF | 255 | 177% | 536 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Linkerd → | |
| 13 | KyvernoCNCF | 192 | 133% | 381 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Kyverno → | |
| 14 | Docker SwarmDocker | 182 | 126% | 361 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Docker Swarm → | |
| 15 | CiliumIsovalent | 155 | 108% | 363 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Cilium → | |
| 16 | HashiCorp ConsulHashiCorp | 144 | 100% | 746 | OPA Gatekeeper vs HashiCorp Consul → | |
| 17 | KarpenterAmazon Web Services | 143 | 99% | 287 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Karpenter → | |
| 18 | Apache ZooKeeperApache Software Foundation | 140 | 97% | 235 | OPA Gatekeeper vs Apache ZooKeeper → | |
| 19 | HashiCorp NomadHashiCorp | 133 | 92% | 295 | OPA Gatekeeper vs HashiCorp Nomad → | |
| 20 | kubectlCloud Native Computing Foundation | 121 | 84% | 206 | soon | |
| 21 | RKE2SUSE (Rancher) | 103 | 72% | 264 | soon | |
| 22 | KEDACNCF | 100 | 69% | 165 | soon | |
| 23 | etcdCNCF | 97 | 67% | 180 | soon | |
| 24 | K3sSUSE (Rancher) | 76 | 53% | 135 | soon | |
| 25 | CalicoTigera | 75 | 52% | 192 | soon | |
| 26 | VMware TanzuVMware | 70 | 49% | 352 | soon | |
| 27 | NVIDIA GPU OperatorNVIDIA | 54 | 38% | 135 | soon | |
| 28 | Azure Service FabricMicrosoft | 46 | 32% | 75 | soon | |
| 29 | KueueKubernetes SIG | 44 | 31% | 94 | soon | |
| 30 | Platform OneUS Department of Defense | 42 | 29% | 85 | soon | |
| 31 | TiltDocker | 40 | 28% | 87 | soon | |
| 32 | Google AnthosGoogle | 39 | 27% | 140 | soon | |
| 33 | controller-runtimeKubernetes SIG API Machinery | 38 | 26% | 57 | soon | |
| 34 | Cluster APICloud Native Computing Foundation | 37 | 26% | 89 | soon | |
| 35 | VolcanoCNCF | 33 | 23% | 83 | soon | |
| 36 | StrimziCNCF | 32 | 22% | 65 | soon | |
| 37 | KubebuilderKubernetes SIG | 30 | 21% | 38 | soon | |
| 38 | Azure Red Hat OpenShiftMicrosoft | 22 | 15% | 64 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on OPA Gatekeeper users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
38 container orchestration are named by companies instead of OPA Gatekeeper: Kubernetes by 14,382 companies, Amazon EKS by 2,864, Helm by 2,714, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/opa-gatekeeper/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
OPA Gatekeeper alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to OPA Gatekeeper?
Kubernetes: 14,382 companies name it in their own job postings, against 144 for OPA Gatekeeper.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on OPA Gatekeeper
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.