OpenCL alternatives
As of 4 November 2026, 23 hpc gpu computing are named by companies instead of OpenCL: CUDA by 1,133 companies, Slurm by 465, MPI by 215.
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
- OpenCL, companies in postings
- 147
- Most used alternative
- CUDA · 1,133
- Fastest hiring, 90 days
- CUDA
- Alternatives ranked
- 23
- Catalogue
- T-1.0.1-prov
hpc gpu computing companies choose instead of OpenCL
Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.
| # | Alternative | Companies | companies | vs OpenCL | postings, 90 d | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUDANVIDIA | 1,133 | 771% | 4,619 | OpenCL vs CUDA → | |
| 2 | SlurmSchedMD | 465 | 316% | 1,591 | OpenCL vs Slurm → | |
| 3 | MPIMPI Forum | 215 | 146% | 698 | OpenCL vs MPI → | |
| 4 | NVIDIA NCCLNVIDIA | 195 | 133% | 812 | OpenCL vs NVIDIA NCCL → | |
| 5 | PBS ProfessionalAltair | 125 | 85% | 337 | OpenCL vs PBS Professional → | |
| 6 | ROCmAMD | 90 | 61% | 338 | soon | |
| 7 | 87 | 59% | 331 | soon | ||
| 8 | OpenMPOpenMP Architecture Review Board | 79 | 54% | 362 | soon | |
| 9 | QiskitIBM | 61 | 41% | 137 | soon | |
| 10 | AMD HIPAMD | 53 | 36% | 148 | soon | |
| 11 | Run:aiNVIDIA | 48 | 33% | 154 | soon | |
| 12 | CUTLASSNVIDIA | 44 | 30% | 153 | soon | |
| 13 | cuDNNNVIDIA | 42 | 29% | 132 | soon | |
| 14 | CirqGoogle | 36 | 24% | 246 | soon | |
| 15 | MLPerfMLCommons | 26 | 18% | 144 | soon | |
| 16 | NVIDIA PTXNVIDIA | 24 | 16% | 143 | soon | |
| 17 | AWS Elastic Fabric AdapterAmazon Web Services | 21 | 14% | 118 | soon | |
| 18 | xCAT | 18 | 12% | 36 | soon | |
| 19 | nvidia-smiNVIDIA | 16 | 11% | 27 | soon | |
| 20 | cuBLASNVIDIA | 15 | 10% | 69 | soon | |
| 21 | PallasGoogle | 15 | 10% | 29 | soon | |
| 22 | SYCLKhronos Group | 15 | 10% | 118 | soon | |
| 23 | UCXUCF Consortium | 14 | 10% | 117 | soon |
Filter on any of them, or on OpenCL users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.
Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
23 hpc gpu computing are named by companies instead of OpenCL: CUDA by 1,133 companies, Slurm by 465, MPI by 215, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/opencl/alternatives)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
- 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
- Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
OpenCL alternatives: questions
What is the most used alternative to OpenCL?
CUDA: 1,133 companies name it in their own job postings, against 147 for OpenCL.
How is this list ranked?
By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.
Does this say which is better?
No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.
Can I get the companies on any of these?
Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.
Get these companies your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on OpenCL
or on what replaces it
Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.