Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Tools · api specs data formats · Alternatives

Web Ontology Language alternatives

As of 4 November 2026, 39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of Web Ontology Language: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892.

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

Web Ontology Language, companies in postings
216
Most used alternative
JSON · 6,396
Fastest hiring, 90 days
JSON
Alternatives ranked
39
Catalogue
T-1.0.1-prov
01Ranked by evidence

api specs data formats companies choose instead of Web Ontology Language

Companies naming each tool in their own postings, and postings in the last 90 days. Bars are relative to the category leader.

#AlternativeCompaniescompaniesvs Web Ontology Languagepostings, 90 dCompare
1
JSONEcma International
6,3962961%19,737Web Ontology Language vs JSON →
2
XMLW3C
5,2642437%12,841Web Ontology Language vs XML →
3
4,8922265%16,002Web Ontology Language vs Model Context Protocol →
4
GraphQLGraphQL Foundation
4,0891893%12,076Web Ontology Language vs GraphQL →
5
SOAPW3C
3,6611695%10,243Web Ontology Language vs SOAP →
6
gRPCCloud Native Computing Foundation
1,753812%4,571Web Ontology Language vs gRPC →
7
OpenAPIOpenAPI Initiative
1,432663%3,245Web Ontology Language vs OpenAPI →
8
YAMLYAML Language Development Team
1,029476%2,569Web Ontology Language vs YAML →
9
942436%2,115Web Ontology Language vs Microsoft Graph →
10
ODataOASIS
844391%3,073Web Ontology Language vs OData →
11
XSLTW3C
820380%1,501Web Ontology Language vs XSLT →
12
CSVIETF
782362%1,180Web Ontology Language vs CSV →
13
722334%2,746Web Ontology Language vs SAP IDoc →
14
Apache ParquetApache Software Foundation
690319%1,246Web Ontology Language vs Apache Parquet →
15
566262%1,102Web Ontology Language vs Protocol Buffers →
16
443205%1,572Web Ontology Language vs Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol →
17
PDFAdobe
405188%839Web Ontology Language vs PDF →
18
ANSI X12ASC X12
371172%761Web Ontology Language vs ANSI X12 →
19
337156%585Web Ontology Language vs Markdown →
20
291135%551Web Ontology Language vs XML Schema (XSD) →
21
Apache AvroApache Software Foundation
280130%560Web Ontology Language vs Apache Avro →
22
272126%763Web Ontology Language vs ISO 20022 →
23
WSDLW3C
256119%511Web Ontology Language vs WSDL →
24
UN/EDIFACTUnited Nations
253117%406Web Ontology Language vs UN/EDIFACT →
25
RDFW3C
221102%813Web Ontology Language vs RDF →
26
JSON SchemaJSON Schema organization
16978%301Web Ontology Language vs JSON Schema →
27
H.264ITU-T / ISO
16074%327Web Ontology Language vs H.264 →
28
XBRLXBRL International
15270%294Web Ontology Language vs XBRL →
29
13763%661Web Ontology Language vs Redfish →
30
H.265ITU-T
12658%244soon
31
RSSRSS Advisory Board
12256%321soon
32
Apache ORCApache Software Foundation
11855%235soon
33
tRPCtRPC contributors
10649%188soon
34
RAMLMuleSoft
10549%187soon
35
Schema.orgSchema.org
10348%148soon
36
9946%146soon
37
DITAOASIS
9644%197soon
38
YANGIETF
8941%286soon
39
OpenUSDAlliance for OpenUSD
8841%291soon
38,897 companies name a api specs data format in their postings.

Filter on any of them, or on Web Ontology Language users who also name an alternative, and open the person who owns the stack.

Start free, no card. The first 20 are above; e-mails are verified at the mail server when you open them.

Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

39 api specs data formats are named by companies instead of Web Ontology Language: JSON by 6,396 companies, XML by 5,264, Model Context Protocol by 4,892, measured from their own job postings. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/tools/owl/alternatives)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • RankingCompanies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system, from the Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov. Editions are folded into their parent product.
  • 90-day postingsOpen postings first seen or posted in the last 90 days that name the tool.
  • Not includedRatings, prices, feature claims, sponsored positions.
FAQ

Web Ontology Language alternatives: questions

What is the most used alternative to Web Ontology Language?

JSON: 6,396 companies name it in their own job postings, against 216 for Web Ontology Language.

How is this list ranked?

By the number of companies whose own postings name the tool as the team's system (Breaknorm technology catalogue T-1.0.1-prov), then by postings in the last 90 days. No ratings, no vendor input, no sponsored positions.

Does this say which is better?

No. It says who uses what, by company size, industry and country, so you can see which tools companies like yours choose. For features and prices, read the vendors.

Can I get the companies on any of these?

Yes: click the tool, see the first 20 companies, and sign up for the full list with verified e-mails. Counting is free.

Companies and people

Get these companies your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on Web Ontology Language
or on what replaces it

Connect the MCP server, filter on any tool. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market